• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

[Tax Planning][17/18] Company structure - spouse

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    It appears alphabet shares are being more and more recommended when the general consensus was to avoid them. Using them just to give 5k tax free divis seems pretty aggressive tax avoidance on the face of it.

    Is alphabet shares now the standard advice whatever the wife's situation and if so how long before HMRC come down on us like a ton of bricks to counter it?
    'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
      It appears alphabet shares are being more and more recommended when the general consensus was to avoid them. Using them just to give 5k tax free divis seems pretty aggressive tax avoidance on the face of it.

      Is alphabet shares now the standard advice whatever the wife's situation and if so how long before HMRC come down on us like a ton of bricks to counter it?
      On the face of it there's nothing about alphabet shares - assuming they are ordinary shares and carry all the same rights - that contradicts what was established in Arctic. They are more than a right to income and therefore the spouse exemption should still apply. That said...

      Would be interesting to see if HMRC pursued a similar argument to the one they did with waivers though. In this case they argued that whilst the underlying gift of shares was not caught due to the spouse exemption, the waivers themselves constituted a separate arrangement in itself and one that was solely a gift of income so therefore a settlement and one that was not covered by the exemption.

      It's not a huge leap of logic for them to argue that declaring dividends on a particular class of shares to take advantage of a spouse's tax allowances could constitute a settlement of income in its own right.

      Of course this brings us back to the thing I always raise when settlements are brought up on here - do HMRC have the time, manpower and will to dig out the settlements legislation again and potentially start another Arctic? Maybe not, although if the use of alphabet shares to take advantage of the dividend allowance becomes more and more prevalent (as you say this advice seems to be becoming more common) then who knows...

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
        It appears alphabet shares are being more and more recommended when the general consensus was to avoid them. Using them just to give 5k tax free divis seems pretty aggressive tax avoidance on the face of it.

        Is alphabet shares now the standard advice whatever the wife's situation and if so how long before HMRC come down on us like a ton of bricks to counter it?
        I've only seen the advice from InTouch - it would be interesting to hear other accountants' views.

        Comment


          #14
          The standard advice for some time has been that alphabet shares can be risky (as per TCP's post above) as being aggressive tax avoidance. Since they now have the right to pursue you for tax avoidance (within the law as written) that they interpret as violating the intent of the law, I would say the risk of alphabet shares is higher than it used to be. The advice historically has been that there should be a legitimate business reason for alphabet shares. The reason given in this thread is not a business reason but a personal tax planning one. I'd hesitate to do it if I were the OP, for those reasons.

          I'll also add that it is my understanding that HMRC has full access to details of the shareholdings of limited companies. It seems likely that they would at some point start looking at companies with one A share and one B share, owned by spouses. I'd just avoid it, personally.

          (Disclaimer: MyCo has alphabet shares, but MyCo is not the standard one man band, and the business reason is to provide a form of profit sharing to employees without risking control of the company.)

          If I were the OP, I would not pay a salary to spouse, since that would put her into higher rate tax. I would want to structure shares such that my spouse could receive £5K dividends tax free, and that I could approximately maximise my income under the higher rate band.

          I would pay myself £8K salary. That would leave £37K available for dividends (presumably that £37K will increase towards £40K or higher in the next few years) without going into the higher rate band. So the target dividends would be £5K for spouse and £37K for myself. I would use an 8-1 split, 8 shares for myself, 1 share for spouse.

          This year, I would pay £4.6K per share in dividends -- £36.8K to me, £4.6K to spouse. As the threshold increases in future years, I would increase the per share dividend, keeping myself within the basic rate band. Once the per share dividend reached £5K, if I still had room within the higher rate band, I would increase the salary instead (which would incur NI liabilities but save on Corporation Tax, so almost a wash).

          If your spouse ever quits her job, you could restructure, everything changes. You probably don't want to change your share structure frequently (that also could look suspicious to HMRC), but it certainly makes sense to review it every 4-5 years.

          Edit: Just noticed this is my 1000th post. Incredible. I need to get a life.

          Comment


            #15
            I think WiB has pretty much nailed it there, I would do that too.

            Happy 10^3 post too, WiB!
            Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
            Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
              It appears alphabet shares are being more and more recommended when the general consensus was to avoid them. Using them just to give 5k tax free divis seems pretty aggressive tax avoidance on the face of it.

              Is alphabet shares now the standard advice whatever the wife's situation and if so how long before HMRC come down on us like a ton of bricks to counter it?
              For me, having the wife involved in your limited company at all comes down to whether she reasonably has time to discharge duties. Mine cleans the study, does the books, sorts out travel expense, etc. and has no other job. I've kept her off the JSA - she would have gone out and got a job elsewhere if I was perm and had no means to gainfully employ her.
              The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist

              Comment


                #17
                Mine cleans the study, but she charges £40 per hour because she does it in the buff

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Antman View Post
                  Mine cleans the study, but she charges £40 per hour because she does it in the buff
                  It'd be £60 if she did it clothed then?
                  The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist

                  Comment


                    #19
                    I can't afford £60, so in the buff it is.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Antman View Post
                      Mine cleans the study, but she charges £40 per hour because she does it in the buff
                      She only charges me £35 but she does wear a pair of marigolds for me which I guess explains the discount
                      'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X