Originally posted by LondonManc
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Who to pursue for unpaid time when working via an umbrella?
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostOi.. Watch it sonny!!The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
Thanks all. (No,Sal, I'm not 12...)
The point is, as I see it, that I worked hours (some off-site) in a particular week. My line manager was aware of this. As it turned out, the senior management subsequently said this was not allowed for contractors- fair enough, but I wasn't aware of that at the time.
So having a timesheet refused if because I had a contract stating all hours were to be worked on site would be fair enough. Having it refused retrospectively is not. To me, as a professional, signing and submitting a timesheet then having it refused on the basis that the client isn't sure that I actually worked the hours, is more or less saying I'm submitting a false timesheet, which is pretty serious.Comment
-
Originally posted by Mercury View PostThanks all. (No,Sal, I'm not 12...)
The point is, as I see it, that I worked hours (some off-site) in a particular week. My line manager was aware of this. As it turned out, the senior management subsequently said this was not allowed for contractors- fair enough, but I wasn't aware of that at the time.
So having a timesheet refused if because I had a contract stating all hours were to be worked on site would be fair enough. Having it refused retrospectively is not. To me, as a professional, signing and submitting a timesheet then having it refused on the basis that the client isn't sure that I actually worked the hours, is more or less saying I'm submitting a false timesheet, which is pretty serious.The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
Originally posted by LondonManc View PostSo you've binned the contract off due to a communication failure?Comment
-
Originally posted by Mercury View PostIt turns out that this particular client allows permanent staff to work from home at will, but doesn't like contractors doing the same.
OK, so you worked from home and they didn't want you to.
Did your contract specifically state that you could work from home?
Did you discuss working from home with those who sign your timesheets prior to doing it?
How many days did you work from home, and how long was the contract?
Originally posted by Mercury View PostSo, by refusing to sign off the timesheet, they are effectively accusing me of fraud, but will not say as much.
No, they are accusing you of working from home when they didn't want you to. That's not accusing you of fraud.
Originally posted by Mercury View PostTo me, as a professional, signing and submitting a timesheet then having it refused on the basis that the client isn't sure that I actually worked the hours, is more or less saying I'm submitting a false timesheet, which is pretty serious.
No, they are accusing you of working from home when they didn't want you to. That's not saying you submitted a false timesheet.
Originally posted by Mercury View PostThe minute they questioned my honesty, that was it.
No, they are accusing you of working from home when they didn't want you to. That's not questioning your honesty.…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
Originally posted by Mercury View PostNo, and maybe I was being OTT, but when I submit a timesheet I expect it to be approved without question. Is that naive? The minute they questioned my honesty, that was it. The question now I guess, is do I stand my ground and go all the way to court, or just drop it? At the end of the day, they put my integrity into question..
I still think there is more to it than you are actually telling us, there usually is in cases like this.The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
-
Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View PostWell, things don't always turn out how we expect.
I still think there is more to it than you are actually telling us, there usually is in cases like this.Comment
-
OK, so you worked from home and they didn't want you to.
Did your contract specifically state that you could work from home?
There was no contract as I was working via an umbrella.
Did you discuss working from home with those who sign your timesheets prior to doing it?
This part is tricky. I said that when the team was on leave, I'll work from home- I was provided with a laptop with secure remote access facilities, and management were aware I was working at home on the days in question.
How many days did you work from home, and how long was the contract? 3 days. Six month contract.
No, they are accusing you of working from home when they didn't want you to. That's not accusing you of fraud. I disagree, refusing to agree my hours is de-facto accusing me of bulltulipting.
No, they are accusing you of working from home when they didn't want you to. That's not saying you submitted a false timesheet. Whats the difference?Comment
-
Originally posted by Mercury View PostNo, and maybe I was being OTT, but when I submit a timesheet I expect it to be approved without question. Is that naive? The minute they questioned my honesty, that was it. The question now I guess, is do I stand my ground and go all the way to court, or just drop it? At the end of the day, they put my integrity into question.Originally posted by Mercury View PostThanks all. (No,Sal, I'm not 12...)
ClientCo is not accusing you of fraud, they questioning the amount of work you want to invoice for. Simple client/supplier dispute. Overreaction and throwing fraud accusations and law suit threats around without even a simple understanding of your situation is not helping your cause.
If your line manager was aware that you were working from home at that time AND was OK with it, but he was overruled by a higher level manager on your time sheets, the wise thing to do is work it out with your line manager.
BTW, do you threaten to sue the ticket inspector in the train for "questioning your integrity" when he asks you for your ticket? Surely if you boarded the train you have one...Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Qdos hit by cybersecurity ‘attack’ Today 01:01
- Why party conference season 2025 is a self-employment policy litmus test Yesterday 09:53
- Labour decommissions Freelance Commissioner idea Sep 8 08:56
- Is it legal to work remotely from Europe via a UK company? Sep 5 22:44
- Is it legal to work remotely from Europe via a UK company? Sep 5 10:44
- Autumn Budget 2025 set for Nov 26, ‘putting contractors on watch’ Sep 4 15:13
- November 2025 Companies House ID rules contractors must follow Sep 3 19:12
- When agencies sink with your contractor invoice: a legal guide Sep 2 17:14
- Reeves ‘to raise VAT registration threshold to £100,000’ Sep 1 06:37
- When your agency shuts: a recruiter’s 5 tips if you’re unpaid Aug 29 06:57
Comment