Originally posted by tim123
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
data breach
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
No, I didn't say that. I'm saying we don't know what data has been taken; there could be sample data in the document(s) for all we know. We simply don't know what's there so cannot discount data protection issues.The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist -
Originally posted by tim123 View PostSo what you are saying is that someone (working on a specific project) has (may have) taken some project specific documents which just happen to contain the name, address and phone numbers (any other personal details) of other people working on that same project, and that act is a data breach?
I think that's pretty far fetched, because surely the dissemination of those details to other people involved with the project is exactly why you might want these details to be there in the first place.
If anyone is guilty of a data protection "crime" in this scenario, it will be the company for not correctly documenting/protecting the use that they were going to make of the data when they asked their employee for it, not the project numpty who copies it into his personal address book.
tim
Nope, the protected data may have included information that should protected (we're not talking about the piffly data protection act).
Let's say he was working for Thales and the project was to fix a bug in the guidance laser of the Starstreak which meant while it couldn't be jammed, it could sent off course. And let's say that was detailed in the project document which also discussed the solutions and showed which one was chosen along with any problems that occurred as a result.
That would be valuable data that should be protected.…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
Originally posted by WTFH View PostNope, the protected data may have included information that should protected (we're not talking about the piffly data protection act).
.
Sorry, but the people to whom I responded were talking about the piffly data protection act
timComment
-
Oh come onOriginally posted by LondonManc View PostNo, I didn't say that. I'm saying we don't know what data has been taken; there could be sample data in the document(s) for all we know. We simply don't know what's there so cannot discount data protection issues.
live "real person" data as samples in project documentation,
and you think that the use of that data by project personnel could be a breach of "data protection" by that user?
As before, if that data were there, then it would be there intending it to be used by project personnel, then the only person in the targets for prosecution if that use is unlawful, is the person responsible for putting it in the document, not the person using it.
The whole company structure has to take responsibility for DP. As a manager, you can't absolve your own responsibility by getting your underlings to sign some contract saying that it is always their fault.
timComment
-
OK, tim if that's your view of the situation, fair enough.
Others of us have a different opinion/experience and have stated it, backing it up with perfectly valid examples.…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
-
He only gets 10 mins internet a day so no time to respond. Give about 6 months and he'll be back with an update.Originally posted by fidot View PostSo, what was the outcome?'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Then point him to the thread about gaps in CVsSo now I am worried, am I being deceived, just how much sugar is really in a spoon full!Comment
-
Comment
-
Lucky outcome, learn from it.Originally posted by Andy2 View PostI apologised and agreed to delete the files. Client decided not to pursue the matter further.
Thanks everyone for some excellent advice.Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Today 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Yesterday 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31

Comment