• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Arctic Systems hearing in the diary

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Arctic Systems hearing in the diary

    From shout99

    http://www.shout99.com/contractors/s...le.pl?id=39795

    Basically implies that the case is unlikely to be heard before xmas therefore leaving another year's tax uncertain.
    Last edited by Pondlife; 5 October 2006, 14:54.

    #2
    Not exactly news. We knew it would be scheduled for that period last January. As soon as Arctic and the PCG hear the actual date, I expect we'll all be told VERY LOUDLY!
    Blog? What blog...?

    Comment


      #3
      At the moment its one all isnt it?

      Mailman

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Mailman
        At the moment its one all isnt it?

        Mailman
        No, at the moment the highest civil court in the land found for Arctic Systems, totally and unanimously dismissed hector's argument and awarded costs against them. Even if the HoL appeal fails, Arctic will only be liable for the back tax Hector claims is due.

        The HoL appeal is a political move, not a legal one. Apart from anything else, were Hector to win at the Lords the total tax now in dispute is around £7k - hardly justifies a £0.5m appeal hearing, does it?
        Blog? What blog...?

        Comment


          #5
          So thats why out taxes go up every year, to fund spurious court cases!

          Mailman

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Mailman
            So thats why out taxes go up every year, to fund spurious court cases!

            Mailman
            It doesn't work like that though, does it.

            If the IR never took any action in court, everyone would take the p1ss.

            The cost of losing a few cases has to be set against the 'wins' that never get that far.

            I do conceed that this particular one has gone too far though.

            tim

            Comment

            Working...
            X