• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Legal question

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Legal question

    My contract is with ABC company trading as "XYZ Limited". Then there is another company with "ABC Limited" own by the same guy. Now "ABC Limited" have gone in to an administration. My contract is signed by ABC trading as XYZ Limited.

    Does ABC limited company going in to administration effects my contract?

    Hope I explained it clearly.

    Cheers

    #2
    What is the Companies House status of XYZ Ltd?

    It might be an indication that your next invoice won't get paid, and that's what matters.
    "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
    - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

    Comment


      #3
      XYZ Ltd is still trading and accounts are up to date on companies house website, however there is registration of charge and then satisfaction of charge last year, I have no idea what it is.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by cojak View Post
        What is the Companies House status of XYZ Ltd?

        It might be an indication that your next invoice won't get paid, and that's what matters.
        Isn't XYZ just a trading name so isn't an entity in it's own right so won't be on companies house. It's all under the umbrella of ABC Ltd and if they are in trouble so are all the other trading names.

        Here is a good explanation that actually uses your company and trading name to make it nice and simple

        “Trading As” - Company and Business Names - TheCompanyWarehouse Blog - Company Formation and Business Startup Advice
        'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by saad View Post
          XYZ Ltd is still trading and accounts are up to date on companies house website, however there is registration of charge and then satisfaction of charge last year, I have no idea what it is.
          Have a look at the link.. The trading name is not registered. I'd say that's a different company so diligence is required here.

          Because a trading name is not registered as a limited company, it is not properly protected. There is always the danger that at a later date someone else may register the trading name as a limited company and then stake their claim
          'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
            Isn't XYZ just a trading name so isn't an entity in it's own right so won't be on companies house. It's all under the umbrella of ABC Ltd and if they are in trouble so are all the other trading names.

            Here is a good explanation that actually uses your company and trading name to make it nice and simple

            “Trading As” - Company and Business Names - TheCompanyWarehouse Blog - Company Formation and Business Startup Advice

            Actually XYZ Limited have different directors and ABC Limited director who I deal with is not in that list.. confusing.

            I cannot disclose the names on public forum but I can PM if you want.

            Technically my contract should be with ABC trading as XYZ Limited, No?

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by saad View Post
              Actually XYZ Limited have different directors and ABC Limited director who I deal with is not in that list.. confusing.
              It's not confusing. It's explained very clearly in the link I sent and the quote in my post after. I'll say it again though, the trading name is not a registered name. The article clearly states that you should check your trading name isn't registered so as not to cause confusion, which it is.

              One thing that does worry me here. He shouldn't be trading as a LTD company. He can have any name he wants but it isn't an LTD. He's either messed up the understanding or he is deliberately being devious. This would worry me somewhat, coupled with the fact the main company is in trouble.

              First of all, The Business Names Act 1985 imposes certain legal requirements on companies adopting this business technique. The most obvious point is the trading name cannot be the same as or similar to another company or business name in a way that might be confusing. In the same way that you cannot register a company name with the same name as a company that is already registered, you cannot register one company name (which is completely different) then use a trading name which is the same as a already registered (and trading) company name.
              I cannot disclose the names on public forum but I can PM if you want.
              I'll pass on that thanks.

              Technically my contract should be with ABC trading as XYZ Limited, No?
              Dunno but as I said I don't think XYZ should be a LTD and ABC is in administration. My alarm bells would be going off like crazy at this point, not trying to fix the wording of the entity.

              I'd spend a bit of time on google to see if you can find anything similar explained there that might give you a clue.
              I have no idea but why are you asking this when ABC is in administration?
              Last edited by northernladuk; 10 September 2015, 09:38.
              'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

              Comment


                #8
                Why not actually ring your client and ask for an explanation?

                I'd be doing a credit check at some point as well.
                'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
                  Why not actually ring your client and ask for an explanation?
                  WHS. It is perfectly reasonable to be worried and to express that concern, especially if the administration is public knowledge. Chase up the MD/director and if they seem shifty or won't take your call, be prepared to walk.
                  Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                  I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                  Originally posted by vetran
                  Urine is quite nourishing

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
                    WHS. It is perfectly reasonable to be worried and to express that concern, especially if the administration is public knowledge. Chase up the MD/director and if they seem shifty or won't take your call, be prepared to walk.
                    ^ This and most definitely the last line!
                    'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X