Originally posted by helen7
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
No To Retro Tax - Ongoing battle against S58 FA2008
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Laxmi View PostHi,
after all the Fraud scare I'm thinking of backing out of the review & ftt as robbers & crooks have
done nothing honest - misled parliament, lied in court etc, no end to their malice, and an endless pool
of career climbing apes that can be corrupted by them -offering sweet deals to judges.
Sorry for the negativity - all looking too scary for me now, since I want to continue being freelance, although
been out of work for nearly a year - can't really take the risk! And, after all didn't we follow QC advice
in the first place. Who would have thought the time machine existed, no-one can tell what low
levels the R&C will scoop too.
It doesnt seem real that you're talking of chucking in the towel with a bunch of "robbers & crooks" because they mentioned fraud.
Up to you, I prefer brave fighters in the trench next to me.I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!Comment
-
looking forward to the next stage
Well done DR and everyone - can't wait to go on the offensive, really relishing it.The Cat
Comment
-
Originally posted by Britspud View PostYou're suggesting paying up now?? just when theres actually some realistic chance of something better?
Then seeing what my options are. I know this is not fraud, unlike some MPs commit and get away with, but I don't trust r&c from playing dirty and making it worse, as we have a winning chance just like before retro. I will give it more thought when we have more information.
Thanks.Comment
-
Originally posted by BolshieBastard View PostJust one question, are you an HMRC stooge?
Silly question really!
It doesnt seem real that you're talking of chucking in the towel with a bunch of "robbers & crooks" because they mentioned fraud.
Up to you, I prefer brave fighters in the trench next to me.Comment
-
Originally posted by Laxmi View PostWe've had many a great moment thinking we can take them down, then they come out with some SH*TE that defys logic and time to take us down. I'm just being cautious and not getting my hopes up too high as we know how the R&C 'work'.Comment
-
Originally posted by Laxmi View PostWe've had many a great moment thinking we can take them down, then they come out with some SH*TE that defys logic and time to take us down. I'm just being cautious and not getting my hopes up too high as we know how the R&C 'work'.
All the best with whatever you decide.Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostThe additional Class 4 NIC is just under 5%.
The accrued interest is the real killer though.
2001/2 - 64%
2002/3 - 57%
2003/4 - 51%
2004/5 - 44%
2005/6 - 37%
2006/7 - 30%
2007/8 - 22%'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostAn APN is only valid if the arrangement was notifiable under DOTAS.
DOTAS was introduced in 2004, hence why APNs can only apply to years 2004/5 onwards.
However, the 2004 DOTAS regime was limited in scope. It was extended in 2006, applying from 2006/7 onwards.
So, there will be circumstances where a scheme was notifiable in 2006/7 but not in 2004/5 or 2005/6. Montpelier are saying this is the case with the DTA scheme.
> Where can one assess if their scheme was registered under DOTAS for the 05/06 year? I only have 2 letters in 10 years from hmrc (plus the settlement opportunity), one for 05/06 and one for 06/07 and both say my return is under investigation due to employment with Edge.
Where can i tell if the Edge scheme is in or out of scope of the limited early years of the DOTAS registration?Comment
-
Message for Banchini
Hi Banchini - you need to allow PM's for me to be able to reply to you
GripComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Yesterday 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
- Why limited company working could be back in vogue in 2025 Dec 16 09:45
- Expert Accounting for Contractors: Trusted by thousands Dec 12 14:47
- Finish the song lyric Dec 12 12:05
- A quick read of the taxman’s Spotlight 67 may not be enough Dec 12 09:27
- Contractor MVL Solution from SFP Dec 11 12:53
- Gary Lineker and HMRC broker IR35 settlement on the hush Dec 11 09:10
- IT contractor jobs market sinks to four-year low in November Dec 10 09:30
- Joke of the Day Dec 9 14:57
Comment