Originally posted by helen7
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
No To Retro Tax - Ongoing battle against S58 FA2008
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Just one question, are you an HMRC stooge?Originally posted by Laxmi View PostHi,
after all the Fraud scare I'm thinking of backing out of the review & ftt as robbers & crooks have
done nothing honest - misled parliament, lied in court etc, no end to their malice, and an endless pool
of career climbing apes that can be corrupted by them -offering sweet deals to judges.
Sorry for the negativity - all looking too scary for me now, since I want to continue being freelance, although
been out of work for nearly a year - can't really take the risk! And, after all didn't we follow QC advice
in the first place. Who would have thought the time machine existed, no-one can tell what low
levels the R&C will scoop too.
It doesnt seem real that you're talking of chucking in the towel with a bunch of "robbers & crooks" because they mentioned fraud.
Up to you, I prefer brave fighters in the trench next to me.I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!
Comment
-
looking forward to the next stage
Well done DR and everyone - can't wait to go on the offensive, really relishing it.The Cat

Comment
-
Well silly thing is I paid IR35 taxes for 5 years. Then went with MTM to recoup that overpayment as I was never inside anyway - bad advise from lazy accountant! I used the IOM for just over a year, I have twice the amount liable on the Loan scheme but haven't even kept up with what's happening there. I just want to not have to deal with this thing going on for years to come. All I'm considering is paying the APN - which doesn't mean I've settled with the crooks, just no penalties.Originally posted by Britspud View PostYou're suggesting paying up now?? just when theres actually some realistic chance of something better?
Then seeing what my options are. I know this is not fraud, unlike some MPs commit and get away with, but I don't trust r&c from playing dirty and making it worse, as we have a winning chance just like before retro. I will give it more thought when we have more information.
Thanks.Comment
-
We've had many a great moment thinking we can take them down, then they come out with some SH*TE that defys logic and time to take us down. I'm just being cautious and not getting my hopes up too high as we know how the R&C 'work'.Originally posted by BolshieBastard View PostJust one question, are you an HMRC stooge?
Silly question really!
It doesnt seem real that you're talking of chucking in the towel with a bunch of "robbers & crooks" because they mentioned fraud.
Up to you, I prefer brave fighters in the trench next to me.Comment
-
We are still fighting! For some of us there is no choice. No money.Originally posted by Laxmi View PostWe've had many a great moment thinking we can take them down, then they come out with some SH*TE that defys logic and time to take us down. I'm just being cautious and not getting my hopes up too high as we know how the R&C 'work'.Comment
-
HMRC are not invincible. And they are definitely fallible.Originally posted by Laxmi View PostWe've had many a great moment thinking we can take them down, then they come out with some SH*TE that defys logic and time to take us down. I'm just being cautious and not getting my hopes up too high as we know how the R&C 'work'.
All the best with whatever you decide.Comment
-
They may aswell piss in the wind for those sort of figures.Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostThe additional Class 4 NIC is just under 5%.
The accrued interest is the real killer though.
2001/2 - 64%
2002/3 - 57%
2003/4 - 51%
2004/5 - 44%
2005/6 - 37%
2006/7 - 30%
2007/8 - 22%'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.Comment
-
i have read hundreds of posts on this thread but i dont think anyone has asked this question (although i suspect this might sound like a basic question).> >Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostAn APN is only valid if the arrangement was notifiable under DOTAS.
DOTAS was introduced in 2004, hence why APNs can only apply to years 2004/5 onwards.
However, the 2004 DOTAS regime was limited in scope. It was extended in 2006, applying from 2006/7 onwards.
So, there will be circumstances where a scheme was notifiable in 2006/7 but not in 2004/5 or 2005/6. Montpelier are saying this is the case with the DTA scheme.
> Where can one assess if their scheme was registered under DOTAS for the 05/06 year? I only have 2 letters in 10 years from hmrc (plus the settlement opportunity), one for 05/06 and one for 06/07 and both say my return is under investigation due to employment with Edge.
Where can i tell if the Edge scheme is in or out of scope of the limited early years of the DOTAS registration?Comment
-
Message for Banchini
Hi Banchini - you need to allow PM's for me to be able to reply to you
GripComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment