- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Confused Newbie regarding 24 month rule (yes another one)
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI hadn't really understood this 'pwned' expression until I read DirtyDog's post. -
The contracts will now cover a 36 month period - without knowing full details of his travel so I could determine whether or not 40% of his time was spent at more than one location over any 24 month period I would not be able to say for certain.Originally posted by DirtyDog View PostSo you think that the OP's situation is caught by the 24-month rule?Comment
-
I'll just go back to my original point - if your employer will not pay your expenses, then whether they are right or not is a moot point. If they are wrong, then you claim it back via your self assessment. If they aren't, then you don't claim it back.Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostThe contracts will now cover a 36 month period - without knowing full details of his travel so I could determine whether or not 40% of his time was spent at more than one location over any 24 month period I would not be able to say for certain.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI hadn't really understood this 'pwned' expression until I read DirtyDog's post.Comment
-
OKOriginally posted by DirtyDog View PostI'll just go back to my original point - if your employer will not pay your expenses, then whether they are right or not is a moot point. If they are wrong, then you claim it back via your self assessment. If they aren't, then you don't claim it back.
Comment
-
In an employment situation, then a claim will depend upon the employers expenses policy and if the policy isn’t in line with HMRC’s legislation then it can be sorted out via self-assessment.
In the case of an umbrella company, where the purpose of the umbrella is to pay the contractor and to do it in a manner that is compliant with HMRC – working through an umbrella is ideal for somebody that doesn’t want to involve themselves with tax returns so the umbrella company should align their policies to HMRC’s legislation.
That is only my opinion of course...
CraigComment
-
This is probably one of the few situations where an employee can sack their employer if they don't like the way they operate.Originally posted by Craig at Nixon Williams View Postthe umbrella company should align their policies to HMRC’s legislation.
Free advice and opinions - refunds are available if you are not 100% satisfied.Comment
-
Thanks for the advice, I am going to phone the umbrella company today as I get paid today so have nothing outstanding with them, if they don't align their policies to HMRC’s legislation, I will find a company that does.
ScottComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Today 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Yesterday 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36


Comment