Originally posted by Waldorf
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Apprentice Levy
Collapse
X
-
-
what the political class in parliament need to do is decide under what legal framework they would prefer freelancers to operate, whether they can indeed claim expenses like employees of a big consultancy would, and so on, and then endorse that model properly. at the moment they don't like one man band limited companies, and they don't like umbrellas, they really need to be asked what model do they want freelancers to use.
the current shambolic political swaying in the wind is a mistake.
the economy needs to make it easier for people to become freelancers, to use the model, and to use that style of engagement, even if only for 6 months between permie jobs. a flexible workforce is what we need, not a workforce tied up in red tape and nonsense.Last edited by CoolCat; 11 December 2015, 20:29.Comment
-
Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostSimply because I don't think the agency would want to do it because there is always the risk of employment costs being enforced as a result of a tribunal decision"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance." CiceroComment
-
Originally posted by Waldorf View PostVery good point, but why do umbrella's not have this risk? I guess they do, hence why Paystream recently got clobbered by a tribunal.Comment
-
Originally posted by Waldorf View PostPerhaps I was thinking of something like this!
Firm claimed to "maximise your pay" while taking sneaky deductions - Andrew Penman - Mirror Online"I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Nov 28 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Comment