Umbrella company monthly take home pay could be more than Limited Company??

**northernladuk** · 4 November 2015, 20:13

Arghhhhhh! It's ADVICE.. With a bloody C!

The general consensus is that an umbrella is better if you gross less than 30k a year. The benefits of a ltd won't kick in under that.

If you are going to earn more than that a LTD is the way to go even if the odd gig is inside. You just account for that gig slightly differently.

If you are going to dip in and bail then an umbrella is much easier. Only you will know if you have enough experience but the fact you are concerned about it would indicate there is a problem.

**ASB** · 5 November 2015, 10:10

Assuming 150/day; 20 days for month, 3 months then

Made up brolly.

Gross income = 150 x 20 = 3000
Less fee 125 (say) = 2875

Er's NI 266
Gross salary 2609
Ee's NI 232
Tax 345

Net 2032

(Adjust by whatever dodgy expenses you feel like, but these should in effect be neutral where they are genuine).

LTD inside IR35, broadly the same as above. But fees will be higher since there will be a total of around £1,000 in accountancy fees. That's about what it is likely to cost for a year. The fact that you are only working over 3 months is largely irrelevant.

LTD outside IR35. Again assume annual accountancy bill of £1,000

Income 3000
Fees 333

Salary 675 (no tax ni etc)

Taxable profit 1992

CT 399

Net profit (pay as dividend with no further tax) 1593

Net yield 2268

Assuming you only claim genuine claimable expenses etc then you will be a bit better off with the LTD if you are outside IR35 (progressively better if you should do it for a full year since the accountancy bills will not change significantly).

If you are inside IR35 then it is certainly going to be broadly the same between your co and brolly.

I have no idea how you get to the 2740 figure from Parasol (well I do, assorted expenses added back, but these may or may not be genuinely ok to claim depending on your circumstances).

If you are only intending to do this for a few months it is very difficult to see anything other than a brolly as being appropriate (and T+S is not claimable on a single engagement since it cannot possibly be a temporary workplace).

ContractorUmbrella post a fair amount; they will give you a proper figure based on your circumstances. You probably won't like it but it will not be based on questionable expenses etc.

**TheFaQQer** · 5 November 2015, 10:11

Originally posted by inbetweener View Post

Using Parasol take home online calc = £2740 net

Using the ContractorUmbrella calculator gives a net £2025.58

Gross income £3000.00
Employer's NI 269.57
Employee's NI 234.41
Employee Tax 356.67
Total All Tax 860.65
CU Margin 105.00
Total Net Income 2,025.58

So I'd be looking very carefully at how Parasol is giving you so much more than that (91%!!)

In fact, having run the numbers through Parasol, if you used their Clearsky accounting, you could get up to £2912.66 a month on a gross income of £3000 - a whopping 97% of your gross!

**ASB** · 5 November 2015, 10:22

Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post

Using the ContractorUmbrella calculator gives a net £2025.58

Gross income £3000.00
Employer's NI 269.57
Employee's NI 234.41
Employee Tax 356.67
Total All Tax 860.65
CU Margin 105.00
Total Net Income 2,025.58

So I'd be looking very carefully at how Parasol is giving you so much more than that (91%!!)

In fact, having run the numbers through Parasol, if you used their Clearsky accounting, you could get up to £2912.66 a month on a gross income of £3000 - a whopping 97% of your gross!

The major differences are:-

1. Apples and pears. Their monthly calc is based on 52/12 (ie 3250 gross not 3000). The weekly calc gives 631.74. x 4 to compare the same thing = 2527 not 2744

2. Arbitrary 317.50 expenses. Given the OP's post I would expect their genuine claimable expenses to be precisely nil. This makes up the difference of course.

**LisaContractorUmbrella** · 6 November 2015, 08:04

I believe I'm right in saying that the calculator the OP refers to assumes an amount of expenses that the OP may or may not be able to claim and this would impact the take home figure - we don't assume anything but allow the contractor to put in their own expenses - that should account for the difference. 90% odd take home is a bit

and

though - that's avoidance scheme territory!

**LisaContractorUmbrella** · 6 November 2015, 13:34

Thought I'd seen it somewhere - the umbrella company the OP mentions uses these assumptions in their calculations:

Assumptions

Umbrella calculation

Based on you working 40 hours per week, 2015/16 tax rates, claiming average expenses (for an employee working and staying away from home of £317.50 per week)
52 weeks per full tax year with the company
Business mileage calculated at 45p per mile for the first 10,000 miles per annum and at 25p thereafter
1060L tax code
You have no earnings from other sources this tax year
Based on 4.3 weeks per month
Limited calculation

Flat Rate Scheme for VAT with first year discount applied (you’ve already selected the appropriate business)
Assignments not subject to IR35
Director’s Wage of £7,956 per annum
Accountancy fees based on the Assure package from our sister company ClearSky Accounting
Based upon average travel and subsistence claims

**inbetweener** · 6 November 2015, 17:49

Thanks for the adviCe

Apologies for any errors , I wrote my original post in a hurry... I hadn't read the Parasol take home calculator assumptions as they were below the Clearsky quote which I wasn't investigating as I already have a Ltd company created with an available accountant.

The only expense I'm likely to claim for is business mileage, estimated around 500 miles a month.

It's starting to look like an Umbrella company is the best option in the short term as I will avoid any further accountancy costs above the my accountant's basic annual £450 fee, although the recruitment company has said that none of their contracts are subject to IR35.

**TheFaQQer** · 7 November 2015, 09:01

Originally posted by inbetweener View Post

the recruitment company has said that none of their contracts are subject to IR35.

Well, they would, wouldn't they!

**LisaContractorUmbrella** · 9 November 2015, 07:45

Originally posted by inbetweener View Post

Apologies for any errors , I wrote my original post in a hurry... I hadn't read the Parasol take home calculator assumptions as they were below the Clearsky quote which I wasn't investigating as I already have a Ltd company created with an available accountant.

The only expense I'm likely to claim for is business mileage, estimated around 500 miles a month.

It's starting to look like an Umbrella company is the best option in the short term as I will avoid any further accountancy costs above the my accountant's basic annual £450 fee, although the recruitment company has said that none of their contracts are subject to IR35.

With IR35, the contract needs to accurately reflect working practices - what's on paper may put you outside IR35 but, if what's written down isn't what you do, it won't be worth anything in the event of an IR35 investigation

Umbrella company monthly take home pay could be more than Limited Company??