• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Public sector IR35 consultation launched

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    TBH, given some of the comments on the article, I think these perceptions are down to contractors themselves, who flash the cash, say "I'll expense it" and generally boast about how little tax they pay. It's a small minority, but while people do behave like that, those who work with them (and possibly know the day rates) are going to think everyone is taking the mickey.
    To a very little extent, the comments actually are more those of jealousy and greed... For many people its fine for people to be self employed if they earn less than you, awful and should be stopped if they earn more than you....
    merely at clientco for the entertainment

    Comment


      Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
      TBH, given some of the comments on the article, I think these perceptions are down to contractors themselves, who flash the cash, say "I'll expense it" and generally boast about how little tax they pay. It's a small minority, but while people do behave like that, those who work with them (and possibly know the day rates) are going to think everyone is taking the mickey.
      Quite. It reminds me of the days when I saw contractors with custom paint jobs for their Porsche's.....they were the same ones who off shored and then panicked when corp tax was due as they'd spent everything in their account.

      There will always be an element of stupidity and rule breaking in any system and it is quick to judge when all you hear is the Gov's version.

      Of those 'citizens' I have spoken to, most don't realise the responsibility we have in relation to running a company,insurances, pension and THE RISK. When you explain the full spectrum they at least get all the information and can then take a balanced and informed view. What they see is not the full story.

      Comment


        Originally posted by eek View Post
        To a very little extent, the comments actually are more those of jealousy and greed... For many people its fine for people to be self employed if they earn less than you, awful and should be stopped if they earn more than you....
        Agree. The most common response I give (politely) when permies bitch about my fee etc is "come join the party". I follow up with the fact that will have costs,risk, no holidays training, etc etc. They soon scuttle back to their desk for a cup of tea and log their hours in their flexible working time sheet

        Fact is, they want to have their cake and eat it......kind like the Gov with taxing us as employees but giving us no rights!

        Comment


          If this PS nonsense comes in, it's going to be boom for brollies - agencies aren't going to want the hassle of payroll, so they will insist that the contractor uses a brolly. I wonder if our brolly friends responded to the consultation.

          Comment


            Just sent what's going to be my default response for CLone contracts from now on

            Sadly I won't be applying for the role. A colleague pointed me at the following consultation
            https://www.gov.uk/government/consul...es-legislation
            which alongside the statement that CLone contracts are subject to Direction and Control as specified in the latest version of
            http://ccs-agreements.cabinetoffice....%20Generic.pdf means that it currently makes sense to only look for work outside the public sector.
            merely at clientco for the entertainment

            Comment


              Originally posted by eek View Post
              Just sent what's going to be my default response for CLone contracts from now on

              Sadly I won't be applying for the role. A colleague pointed me at the following consultation
              https://www.gov.uk/government/consul...es-legislation
              which alongside the statement that CLone contracts are subject to Direction and Control as specified in the latest version of
              http://ccs-agreements.cabinetoffice....%20Generic.pdf means that it currently makes sense to only look for work outside the public sector.
              And a very nice response from the Agent accepting my decision and stating that he feels that if they want to treat people like employees they will need to employ them as employees.
              merely at clientco for the entertainment

              Comment


                Originally posted by eek View Post
                And a very nice response from the Agent accepting my decision and stating that he feels that if they want to treat people like employees they will need to employ them as employees.
                Thought you might have also gone with "or my day rate to reflect the status of the contract is £xxxx" to see the reaction
                The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist

                Comment


                  Don't many of the larger agencies already deal with temps that are employed and paid by them, so will already have all the PAYE stuff in place to add PS contractors onto for next year?

                  So this will impact the smaller agencies that either don't have or don't want that ability, depending how much upheaval/cost it will have on them to implement.

                  If the above is in any way on the right lines then the new legislation could be seen as a pincer movement by consultancies and big agencies to corner the market, aided by the govermin after the lobbying of appropriate MPs to give them the unfair advantage.

                  No need for brollies either if the agency takes that role.
                  Maybe tomorrow, I'll want to settle down. Until tomorrow, I'll just keep moving on.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
                    Thought you might have also gone with "or my day rate to reflect the status of the contract is £xxxx" to see the reaction
                    To be honest the statement of under supervision direction and control by a civil servant is enough to put me off for good.

                    If you are going to treat me as a member of staff go and find a member of staff. If you want the specialist who would keep that system going for the next 21 months employ me as the specialist and leave me to it..

                    The fact the CLone document now explicitly states you are under SDC means I would seriously recommend avoiding anything to do with CLone even without the proposed changes...
                    merely at clientco for the entertainment

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by eek View Post
                      To be honest the statement of under supervision direction and control by a civil servant is enough to put me off for good.

                      If you are going to treat me as a member of staff go and find a member of staff. If you want the specialist who would keep that system going for the next 21 months employ me as the specialist and leave me to it..

                      The fact the CLone document now explicitly states you are under SDC means I would seriously recommend avoiding anything to do with CLone even without the proposed changes...
                      It's not CLOne, it's all PS recruitment if you can't get in as a B2B supplier.
                      Blog? What blog...?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X