Originally posted by eek
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
C# architecture
Collapse
X
-
This is true. The strategy is to extract the core code into a separate submodule so the application can link to whichever version of the core code they want to use. This core stuff has been refactored so it is all under a sub-directory ready to be moved. Once this has been done and everything is settled, the rest of the code base will be split out until everything is separated. -
That statement fills me with dread - no problem locking down a particular version of the code base to go with a release / hotfixes but you don't want to end up in a position where an upgrade to a new core version requires weeks of work because they haven't been keeping things up to date.Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
This is true. The strategy is to extract the core code into a separate submodule so the application can link to whichever version of the core code they want to use. This core stuff has been refactored so it is all under a sub-directory ready to be moved. Once this has been done and everything is settled, the rest of the code base will be split out until everything is separated.
When discussing how things will play out long term remind them that for sanity purposes alone they need to keep upto date with the latest core version for rapid security fixes if nothing else.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Good shoutOriginally posted by eek View PostWhen discussing how things will play out long term remind them that for sanity purposes alone they need to keep upto date with the latest core version for rapid security fixes if nothing else.Comment
-
Indeed. Theory often has to take a hike when it sees the projects we've inheritedOriginally posted by MyUserName View Post
I agree that normally this would be the best approach but we have to split the repos out as we are beginning to release multiple products on different schedules so having them all in one along with the core code is causing bigger issues.
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Aug 28 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Aug 27 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27
- Budget 2026: Contractor advisers ask for ‘IR35 reset’ Aug 24 04:57
- Why might an umbrella company fail to pay its total tax bill to HMRC? Aug 18 06:08
- Contractors, here are the late payment fixes that the Lords just turned down Aug 17 08:03
- How will HMRC's Direct Debit plan affect contractors paying VAT and PAYE? Aug 13 23:54
- HMRC's new 'reckless' tax offence: an IR35 game-changer for contractors? Aug 13 13:50
- “I’m not a Machiavellian overlord”: Adrian Sacco breaks his silence on the Contractor Loan Recalls Aug 13 06:50

Comment