Originally posted by eek
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
C# architecture
Collapse
X
-
This is true. The strategy is to extract the core code into a separate submodule so the application can link to whichever version of the core code they want to use. This core stuff has been refactored so it is all under a sub-directory ready to be moved. Once this has been done and everything is settled, the rest of the code base will be split out until everything is separated. -
That statement fills me with dread - no problem locking down a particular version of the code base to go with a release / hotfixes but you don't want to end up in a position where an upgrade to a new core version requires weeks of work because they haven't been keeping things up to date.Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
This is true. The strategy is to extract the core code into a separate submodule so the application can link to whichever version of the core code they want to use. This core stuff has been refactored so it is all under a sub-directory ready to be moved. Once this has been done and everything is settled, the rest of the code base will be split out until everything is separated.
When discussing how things will play out long term remind them that for sanity purposes alone they need to keep upto date with the latest core version for rapid security fixes if nothing else.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Good shoutOriginally posted by eek View PostWhen discussing how things will play out long term remind them that for sanity purposes alone they need to keep upto date with the latest core version for rapid security fixes if nothing else.Comment
-
Indeed. Theory often has to take a hike when it sees the projects we've inheritedOriginally posted by MyUserName View Post
I agree that normally this would be the best approach but we have to split the repos out as we are beginning to release multiple products on different schedules so having them all in one along with the core code is causing bigger issues.
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment