• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Recommendations for deep copying C# object

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Serialize then de-serialize using protobuf-net.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Churchill View Post
      And you've just proved why C# is tulipe!
      Why do you think that Spod?

      Do you mean C# or .NET in general?



      Personally I think Suity has proved Suity is tulipe

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
        Why do you think that Spod?

        Do you mean C# or .NET in general?



        Personally I think Suity has proved Suity is tulipe
        Firstly, Microsoft's half arsed attempt to produce a competitor to Java.

        Windows itself is massively overweight and resource hungry.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by Churchill View Post
          Firstly, Microsoft's half arsed attempt to produce a competitor to Java.

          Windows itself is massively overweight and resource hungry.
          It's 2014, not 2004.
          Originally posted by MaryPoppins
          I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
          Originally posted by vetran
          Urine is quite nourishing

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by d000hg View Post
            It's 2014, not 2004.
            I was asked for my thoughts on the subject. **** off back to your "bible".

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by Churchill View Post
              Firstly, Microsoft's half arsed attempt to produce a competitor to Java.

              Java itself is massively overweight and resource hungry.
              FTFY.

              .NET's done pretty well. You'd have to say it's at least whole arsed.
              Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
                FTFY.

                .NET's done pretty well. You'd have to say it's at least whole arsed.
                As a gravy train its been good. But my own preference would be a language like Go on Linux.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
                  FTFY.

                  .NET's done pretty well. You'd have to say it's at least whole arsed.
                  Yep, it's a hefty enough toolkit. However, when I need to use it I prefer C++

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by Unix View Post
                    As a gravy train its been good. But my own preference would be a language like Go on Linux.
                    It'll be interesting to see if "Swift" becomes more mainstream.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by Unix View Post
                      As a gravy train its been good. But my own preference would be a language like Go on Linux.
                      I suspect for a while javascript and node will be the winner. But its not the greatest system in the world.

                      I doubt swift will do well. Most people don't develop just for Apple...
                      merely at clientco for the entertainment

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X