• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Anyone have experience of the 4 UCs Lorien will deal with?"

Collapse

  • Aspidistra
    replied
    So far...

    in case it's of help to others, this is the state of play so far from the first two to respond, which were Paystream and Nasa.

    1. Both will pay in to a HL SIPP. Woot.

    2. Both do carry-forward. Double woot.

    They do not check contribution limits in any way, it's the responsibility of the worker to contact their pension provider and make sure the contributions are diverted appropriately (various years). Which is fine, it's as I hoped.

    My question regarding overpaying...

    Mechanics of Salary Sacrifice.
    Paystream said the way it works is that HMRC only allow contribution variations when there is a change of circumstances. That can include being at the end of a contract and it can also be varied at the end of each tax year. However...

    One can simply fund to the maximum until the available pension contributions are used up and then cease contributions for the year, then re-start the next year. There are no issues with doing that apparently.

    There is a small question he couldn't answer over what happens if you get near to using up all your cont. limit and the next payment takes you over... he's gone away to find out about that.

    Nasa solution. So these two seem very closely matched in terms of the features, but one other point worth mentioning is that Nasa's solution is a "hybrid" where you can use your Ltd co and be inside and outside IR35 at different times. I'll need to delve into that more closely.

    I'll post more when/if I hear from the others - I've yet to compare costs etc but I suspect they'll be much of a muchness.

    QUESTION: as I read the other threads I noticed a few disparaging comments re Nasa - but nothing concrete as to why. If anyone can share reasons not to go that route I'd be interested/grateful.

    Leave a comment:


  • courtg9000
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    Agencies will often only pay when the client pays them.

    One reason for ensuring you don't opt out of the agency regulations is because that allows agencies to add clauses like we won't pay you until we've received the money from the end client (sorry but that is your problem, you as an agency should have checked they had the money to pay the bills).
    Not during my time owning the shareholding in the agency. A few years before that.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by Aspidistra View Post
    Blimey. I'll have to keep an eye out for any backsliding.

    It's difficult to imagine why they would do that - I mean, they've been around for many years before and since, so it's not as if they were insolvent?
    Agencies will often only pay when the client pays them.

    One reason for ensuring you don't opt out of the agency regulations is because that allows agencies to add clauses like we won't pay you until we've received the money from the end client (sorry but that is your problem, you as an agency should have checked they had the money to pay the bills).

    Leave a comment:


  • Aspidistra
    replied
    Originally posted by courtg9000 View Post
    I only have had one experience with Lorien. 10 years ago.
    I walked off site after they had built up a 30k debt.
    They settled after I got debt collectors involved.
    Other contractors were not so lucky and they never paid some apparently.
    Blimey. I'll have to keep an eye out for any backsliding.

    It's difficult to imagine why they would do that - I mean, they've been around for many years before and since, so it's not as if they were insolvent?

    Leave a comment:


  • courtg9000
    replied
    I only have had one experience with Lorien. 10 years ago.
    I walked off site after they had built up a 30k debt.
    They settled after I got debt collectors involved.
    Other contractors were not so lucky and they never paid some apparently.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aspidistra
    replied
    I should perhaps have been clearer in my first post - I do realise that carry-forward can only happen once "this year" has been funded and the HL SIPP is already running...

    The issue with changing contribution levels is the key question - it's hard to explain, but basically...

    It seems to me that someone playing catch-up will be contributing a lot to the pension while they are doing that, and then... once they're fully caught up, they need to avoid over-funding which must mean reducing the contribution level.

    And presumably that change would need to happen whenever any further contributions would over-fund (take it beyond allowed limits).

    The other key question is just to understand if anyone has had problems with any of the 4 mentioned. In other threads there have been some veiled comments suggesting that they're... not all exactly wonderful, but nothing specific was said - maybe people are reluctant to slag off a company in public? Feel free to send a PM if so, it would be treated in confidence of course.

    Leave a comment:


  • Acme Thunderer
    replied
    Originally posted by Aspidistra View Post

    One poster suggested that you shouldn't (be able to) vary payments for 12 months - unless there are exceptional changes in circumstances - or HMRC may see the arrangement as "not a proper Salary Sac".
    There was a discussion about how Paystream handle Pension contributions a couple of weeks ago where you probably read that comment. I'm with Paystream and they allow me to change pension contributions at New Tax Year or Contract Change/Renewal. I took advantage of that a couple of months ago when I got an extension.
    Last edited by Acme Thunderer; 22 October 2020, 16:04. Reason: Trimmed quote down

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by Paralytic View Post
    Have you asked each of the 4 UC's your first question?

    The other 2 questions are your concern, not not theirs, but its correctly been pointed out that you have to use "this years" pension allowance first, then working back through the previous years when you had a pension.

    I do know that NASA does allow salary sacrifice into an existing pension, and do not restrict the payment each month to £3333K per month (£40K for the year). I don't know if they allow this to be paid into a HL SIPP.

    You'll get a few answers here but what does that really tell you? You'd be better off firing an email off to each, giving your day rate, tax code and intended pension contribution, and ask for an illustrative payslip.
    It should actually be a Key Information Document as that is what should be being used from April 2020 onwards.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paralytic
    replied
    Have you asked each of the 4 UC's your first question?

    The other 2 questions are your concern, not not theirs, but its correctly been pointed out that you have to use "this years" pension allowance first, then working back through the previous years when you had a pension.

    I do know that NASA does allow salary sacrifice into an existing pension, and do not restrict the payment each month to £3333K per month (£40K for the year). I don't know if they allow this to be paid into a HL SIPP.

    You'll get a few answers here but what does that really tell you? You'd be better off firing an email off to each, giving your day rate, tax code and intended pension contribution, and ask for an illustrative payslip.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by Aspidistra View Post
    Lorien offer a choice of:

    Giant
    NASA
    Orange Genie
    Paystream

    I've read through lots of threads/posts here and still can't get my head around some of the issues. What I'd be looking to do:

    1. Contribute to an existing (Hargreaves Lansdown) SIPP via salary sacrifice (the full £40k in the rest of this tax year).
    2. Use the carry-forward for the last 3 years (looking to fund the "oldest" year, as far as possible, before the end of this tax year).
    3. Keep my Ltd Co running (may be done separately, perhaps as a dormant co, but that may be a separate issue)

    I read in other threads that not all UCs deal with Salary Sac well, in particular there can be issues with varying payments.

    One poster suggested that you shouldn't (be able to) vary payments for 12 months - unless there are exceptional changes in circumstances - or HMRC may see the arrangement as "not a proper Salary Sac".

    But then... how do you catch up with carry-forward unless you can vary payments? I mean, once we've filled up the £40k for previous years, don't we then need to change the payment amount - especially if we've also filled up "this year" as well - otherwise we'd be over-funding the pension? It all seems a bit unclear.

    I'd be grateful if anyone can shed some light, maybe share some experiences/knowledge of these 4 companies (and of Lorien).

    Thanks in advance.


    There are too many questions there but a few quick answers / correction

    1) you use this years pension allowance first and then previous years (starting with the oldest one second).
    2) of course you need the sipp to already be running.
    3) That poster regarding circumstances isn't 100% right but nor is he wrong. Your pension contributions should really only change if your circumstances change (so renewals / divorce / new baby). Basically you need a reason other than this month my expenses will be more.
    4) I don't know of anyone who will do salary sacrifice into a HL pension - but would be curious to what the umbrella companies say.

    Leave a comment:


  • Anyone have experience of the 4 UCs Lorien will deal with?

    Lorien offer a choice of:

    Giant
    NASA
    Orange Genie
    Paystream

    I've read through lots of threads/posts here and still can't get my head around some of the issues. What I'd be looking to do:

    1. Contribute to an existing (Hargreaves Lansdown) SIPP via salary sacrifice (the full £40k in the rest of this tax year).
    2. Use the carry-forward for the last 3 years (looking to fund the "oldest" year, as far as possible, before the end of this tax year).
    3. Keep my Ltd Co running (may be done separately, perhaps as a dormant co, but that may be a separate issue)

    I read in other threads that not all UCs deal with Salary Sac well, in particular there can be issues with varying payments.

    One poster suggested that you shouldn't (be able to) vary payments for 12 months - unless there are exceptional changes in circumstances - or HMRC may see the arrangement as "not a proper Salary Sac".

    But then... how do you catch up with carry-forward unless you can vary payments? I mean, once we've filled up the £40k for previous years, don't we then need to change the payment amount - especially if we've also filled up "this year" as well - otherwise we'd be over-funding the pension? It all seems a bit unclear.

    I'd be grateful if anyone can shed some light, maybe share some experiences/knowledge of these 4 companies (and of Lorien).

    Thanks in advance.

Working...
X