- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Microsoft Frontpage 2003
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Microsoft Frontpage 2003"
Collapse
-
What a coincidence, I`ve just been converting a FP site into standards-compliant HTML/CSS. The code produced by FP is a disgusting mess.
-
Any website built in FP2003 automatically makes use of the FP extensions unless when you first create the website in FP you specifically TURN OFF the extensions support first. Few users do this so they are then automatically trapped into using FP to maintain the website. Using anything else will break the website unless you are very careful or very lucky. I know of hosts who refuse to install FP extensions on their server because they're so unreliable. You really should migrate away from a FP website IMO. Learning a bit of PHP and using a decent PHP based CMS like Mambo, Joomla etc... really will pay you dividends. HTH.
Leave a comment:
-
I use Frontpage because it came with my Office install. It is total rubbish. I got the site up and going quickly - which is all that I cared about at the time.
It works fine with IE but some things don't work with Firefox. I did not notice that a couple of my pages displayed as blank in Firefox until some kind person told me. No doubt caused due to proprietry CSS which only worked well on IE.
If the site is not using webbots...it probably is... you should be able to switch to something else fairly easily...otherwise you're stuck until you can get rid of the webbots.
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks guys;
From what you say, compared to other products out there Frontpage is cr*p. It will however do a job. Taking onboard that advice, I think I'll soldier on and do what tweaks I can in Frontpage to keep their site active, learn some of the FP and HTML basics whils doing so, then look at one of the better products out there to totally revamp the site into something which;
will do them proud
will increase my knowledge of website design
will be easier/better coded?
Leave a comment:
-
To elaborate on the above comments- It is almost 100% certain that the website created in FP2003 will be using FP extensions on the server. They are (IMO) very flaky indeed and unfortunately the FP site management tools rely on the extensions to work. The site management features IMO are probably the weakest part of FP2003. You are lumbered with FP really as no other package will really be compatible with all he cr*p that FP generates as part of the FP extensions. You'll' find the web site directories are crammed full of files that you have no idea why they're there but without them the website and FP will not work properly. I suspect that the previous admin chap has packed it in through sheer frustration. I seriously suggest you learn a good CMS package like Joomla or Mambo instead. Seriously, cut your losses before you die of frustration using FP2003.
Leave a comment:
-
I have a friend who is not a techie who uses Coffeecup Html Editor. It includes WYSIWYG, FTP, templates and some graphics. For someone who doesnt want to get into it too deeply, his site doesnt look half bad.
Leave a comment:
-
Frontpage
I use Frontage for my website.
I do understand HTLM but - well life is too short to code in HTML and you don't have to now.
If already setup to use Frontpage then I would continue to use it, otherwise I would use something else instead because Microsoft now has a replacement so Frontage is now the old version and anyway - it's a bit buggy and rubbish - but it does do the job.
Problems that I have in Frontage are:
It is not WYSIWYG - What you see is what you get - it is to a point but, well close but no cigar.
It upload is rubbish and fails very easily. Sometimes I just can't be bothered to try the Frontage uploader and just use CuteFTP instead.
Frontage creates too many proprietary files and directories which requires Frontpage extensions on the web server.
The interface is a bit clunky.
It does work though.
Leave a comment:
-
I loathe FrontPage, and if you were starting a new project I'd suggest you avoid it at all costs - though very user-friendly, it outputs terrible code.
BUT given that:
- You are working with an existing site that has been constructed and maintained using it;
- You are giving your time for nothing;
- You aren't (at this stage) looking to develop technical skills, but merely to get things done;
I would stick with it for now. There's no point going for WordPress or Joomla - that would mean throwing away the existing site and starting from scratch.
If you find it interesting enough to learn more about the technical aspects then you can gradually migrate the site away from FrontPage, but for now it should meet your needs.
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks guys, like I said I'm not technical.
I don't even understand what you're saying with CMS and CSS, I guess wordpress is a software package?
I'll give it a go and as I get more competent, I'll see about taking on some of these TLA's
Leave a comment:
-
Whilst i detest any version of Frontpage with a vengance - it IS easy to use and you CAN certainly make a great looking site with it to answer your original Q's.
If the site is already set up for Frontpage access then its (unfortunately) probably the best way to go.
Try developing a lovely .NET site in DW/VS and watch someone using Frontpage completely and utterly destroy the entire code in one swift publish
Leave a comment:
-
Gadzooks... Frontpage.
I would seriously consider using a wordpress or joomla template that suits your purposes from the off. Rather a basic but clean CMS driven site than getting yourself in a tizz with markup and CSS - if you have no technical background.
Leave a comment:
-
I did try learning a little HTML a few years back...
Got the Websites for Dummies book and everything...
I got very confused and very frustrated. I knew what I wanted to do but for the life of me couldn't do it.
Leave a comment:
-
If you've already got a site there and FrontPage in front of you then it's probably worth using it for now to make quick changes and find your way around. I guess it really depends if you want to develop an interest such things, picking up a sound knowledge of HTML and CSS.Originally posted by thelace View PostThanks Voodoo
Would you advise a novice to try it in Frontpage 1st then work upto something more professional?
I'd be happy with that.
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks Voodoo
Would you advise a novice to try it in Frontpage 1st then work upto something more professional?
I'd be happy with that.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers


Leave a comment: