Originally posted by OwlHoot
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Quad or eight core?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Quad or eight core?"
Collapse
-
It works on my quad core Intel box with XP Pro 64.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostTalking about multi-core, I found that 7-zip won't run on any of them, even dual-core, which seems very odd. Let's hope the author fixes it pronto, because it is one of the best compression programs, far better than cranky old WinZip, and is free (open-source actually).
HTH.
Leave a comment:
-
Talking about multi-core, I found that 7-zip won't run on any of them, even dual-core, which seems very odd. Let's hope the author fixes it pronto, because it is one of the best compression programs, far better than cranky old WinZip, and is free (open-source actually).
Leave a comment:
-
But someone else is. So the best option is to give that person good analysis and conclude that you will do fine with a quad core, which would also save money to whoever is paying: this means you will be in their good books - priceless, eh?Originally posted by dude69 View Posti ain't paying.
Leave a comment:
-
i ain't paying.
so i just want the best option of those two, nothing else besides those two options
Leave a comment:
-
A dual core is more than enough for a VS. But if you write software that should use multiple cores than having quad core is very good.
Leave a comment:
-
I'll just weigh in now that I've had a half hour playing with VS2008... It all seems IO bound, so I can't really tell the difference on the number of cores. I swapped in a solid state hard disk, now that speeded things up.
HTH
Leave a comment:
-
Quad will be more than enough - I run VS 2005 on dual core AMD and it's fine, just have plenty of RAM (at least 2 GB), just had VS 2008 installed the other day but have not used it much, but it seems to be more or less inline with VS 2005 requirements.
Best get PC with single quad core, rather than twin dual cores - you don't need Xeons for this, get Q6600 it is a fine quad core chip, I use it in one of my servers, the other one uses dual quad cores Xeons, and more yet use dual cores
Leave a comment:
-
If you are running Vista, as many as possible, a few hundred preferably.
Leave a comment:
-
Why not 1 x quad core for the time being, then you can always drop another processor in at some stage if you need to?
Leave a comment:
-
Quad or eight core?
Have a choice for my new work PC.
I will be running Visual Studio 2008
Either: 2 * Xeon 5320 Quad 1.86GHz. Total Eight cores
Or 2 * Xeon 5140 Dual 2.33GHz. Total Four cores.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Today 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Yesterday 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44

Leave a comment: