• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "New Mac mini, software dev question."

Collapse

  • d000hg
    replied
    FWIW the modern MacMini is pretty quick even on the cheap config. I run an i7 quad-core 2012 Mac Mini and it's still pretty powerful. THe 2018 version is TWO updates beyond that and seems to have quad-core minimum even on i3 so assuming XCode can compile using threading effectively, I'd be quite confident.

    XCode also surprises me by IIRC compiling in the background much better than I am used to with VC++?

    But yes if you are using this for serious work, the money is surely worth it. If you want to run Parallels or something, definitely.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheCyclingProgrammer
    replied
    If you're doing regular app dev, get the fastest machine you can afford. Swift compilation is still pretty slow.

    Leave a comment:


  • BackupBoy
    replied
    Absolutely positive I can. It’s designed to be a non trivial task, and just as fiddly as replacing storage in the 2012 versions, but eminently doable if one deploys a clue or two.

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by BackupBoy View Post
    I’ve seen Geekbench 64-bit single core tests scores (4793) that put the new quad-core i3 way ahead of the 6-core Xeon in the 2013 trashcan Pro (3811) so I’d say you’d be fine.

    I’m getting the i3/8GB/512GB and will add extra RAM myself.
    Are you sure you can add your own RAM?

    Mac mini: How to remove or install memory - Apple Support

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    My old 2009 MacBook Pro can’t run Xcode etc any more. So I’m looking at the lastest Mac mini and the cheapo i3 option.

    Will this be powerful enough or should I splash out more cash for an upgrade?
    It probably depends what development you do and how much you do. 9-5 C++ compilation, or the odd bit of app-dev in the evenings? Building a load of open-source stuff from source all the time?

    I'd guess it will OK but could be annoying if you are doing big builds all the time.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    My company iPad Pro is coming in at 3963 single, 9570 multi.
    The company's iMac is 5258/16048 (i5-7600K)

    Leave a comment:


  • BackupBoy
    replied
    I’ve seen Geekbench 64-bit single core tests scores (4793) that put the new quad-core i3 way ahead of the 6-core Xeon in the 2013 trashcan Pro (3811) so I’d say you’d be fine.

    I’m getting the i3/8GB/512GB and will add extra RAM myself.

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    started a topic New Mac mini, software dev question.

    New Mac mini, software dev question.

    My old 2009 MacBook Pro can’t run Xcode etc any more. So I’m looking at the lastest Mac mini and the cheapo i3 option.

    Will this be powerful enough or should I splash out more cash for an upgrade?
Working...
X