• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Qnap vs. Synology vs. HP Microserver NAS"

Collapse

  • SimonMac
    replied
    Buy the 2GB version and get the extra memory from Cruical, its a lot cheaper (I did the same with my WD-DL4100)

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Thanks guys! I've decided that MyCo is getting this for Christmas:

    QNAP TS-453 Pro 4 Bay Powerful, Reliable and Scalable Network Attached Storage with 8GB Memory for SMBs: Amazon.co.uk: Computers & Accessories

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by Platypus View Post
    Interesting... why?
    I wanted to use ZFS after I read about bit corruption (happened to a friend of mine and he lost lots of his photos because of it)

    Leave a comment:


  • ShandyDrinker
    replied
    Originally posted by FarmerPalmer View Post
    I have a QNAP (TS-419P) which I have had running faultlessly for over 5 years.
    ^^This. I've also got a QNAP (TS-210) and it's been running reliably for 4 years now. Just upgraded the disks for larger capacity. For the money even the entry level models are excellent. The TS-210 only takes 2 drives and is running RAID 1 but that's all I need for a file server.

    Leave a comment:


  • Boney M
    replied
    I have the HP Microserver and have had no problems with it. I run several VM's for a home lab on it and also Kodi and also synology cannot see why you would leave it.

    How have you got it set up?

    Leave a comment:


  • FarmerPalmer
    replied
    I have a QNAP (TS-419P) which I have had running faultlessly for over 5 years.

    Leave a comment:


  • stek
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    I replaced my Qnap with an HP Microserver running FreeNAS.
    We've had nothing but bother with FreeNAS at clientco, was my decision to use it too. Ripped it out and used the WSS 2012 that came with the NAS's.

    Have to use Windows now

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    I replaced my Qnap with an HP Microserver running FreeNAS.
    Interesting... why?

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    I replaced my Qnap with an HP Microserver running FreeNAS.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    I have a WD DL-4100, £350 without disks and is flawless, there is a consumer version for about £288 but the extra features on the DL is well worth the 60 odd quid difference

    Leave a comment:


  • unixman
    replied
    I follow the red hot deals Uk "computing" section where these are regularly discussed. Synology and QNAP are highly spoken off. Haven't got one personally. I've got a Buffalo Linkstation and would not recommend.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pondlife
    replied
    I have a Synology Homecloud box and am very happy with it. Not used either of your others so can't compare against but it's quieter than the WD NAS I also have.

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    started a topic Qnap vs. Synology vs. HP Microserver NAS

    Qnap vs. Synology vs. HP Microserver NAS

    I currently have an HP Microserver configured with unRAID software and it runs fine. But last time I power-cycled it, the USB containing the O/S had become corrupted (I suspect a problem with the OS) and it was a PITA to get it going again.

    I'm kind of fancying getting a QNAP NAS and using the drives I currently have in the HP. At £400 odd it's quite an expensive solution but it would add Plex and hopefully an OS that doesn't self-corrupt.

    Any views on Qnap vs. Synology? the Qnap looks suspiciously identical to the HP Microserver, so it's a bit of a rip-off to charge £400 for it! I guess one's paying for the software.
Working...
X