• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "This great forum is disintegrating very quickly - here is how to stop it"

Collapse

  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by ztt View Post
    mods are really quite 20 century

    legally no mods are the way to go

    and less rules
    The CCNet approach eh - no registration, anonymous posters and top quality banter all day long - & not a bed wetter in sight.
    Now ruined by forced registration and over moderation & a pale shadow of its former self

    There must be a place for an un-restricted forum - or are owners of the infrastructure too risk averse to host such a venue?

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    I disagree.

    NAT had very good reasons for acting in that way - there were people that were intent on provoking the issue, and I count myself within that group. However, tonight's fun and games is a completely different thing all together.

    FWIW, I have no issue with NAT as a moderator, despite what I said (or implied) in the past.
    Yep - agree with this. As a (mostly) well behaved onlooker, I though NAT was perhaps a little over enthusiastic at the very beginning, but was pushed pretty hard. I don't think he had public spats with other mods, or banned any of them.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Wikir Man
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    If it'll stop this meltdown, go for it. As a prat once said: "I am glum". This on top of today being only a half day
    NotAllThere
    Banned
    This makes me glum

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    If it'll stop this meltdown, go for it. As a prat once said: "I am glum". This on top of today being only a half day

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Poll moved to Light Relief, and why would that be? Ah I get it - ABUSE OF POWER!
    Probably because you're spamming General with anti mod sentiment and this is another part of that spam perhaps?

    Application of power or abuse, pretty subjective line.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Poll moved to Light Relief, and why would that be? Ah I get it - ABUSE OF POWER!

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by Nicely Nicely View Post
    ftfy. NAT was as bad.
    I disagree.

    NAT had very good reasons for acting in that way - there were people that were intent on provoking the issue, and I count myself within that group. However, tonight's fun and games is a completely different thing all together.

    FWIW, I have no issue with NAT as a moderator, despite what I said (or implied) in the past.

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by fullyautomatix View Post
    Welcome back ATW. Your presence is needed to bring normalty back.
    I can't agree with that.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    CUK is currently a bit like what I imagine living in China or Australia would be like...

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by realityhack View Post


    That's like civil war or something....

    Leave a comment:


  • chef
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    It's a roll back - new mods destroyed the balance, the only way to be sure is to fully roll back. Nuking from orbit isn't an option at the moment so banning them all is the only way to sure.

    Any mod should get banned for a fairly long period of time - this way they'd appreciate what it is to be banned and thus, hopefully, appreciate that banning people is the last resort.
    I really would never believe you're from a Soviet background.. you should meet gf chef, she's German and has similar ingrained ideas to you for punishment/order..

    Leave a comment:


  • realityhack
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    The poll was tampered with, options were edited!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • ztt
    replied
    mods are really quite 20 century

    legally no mods are the way to go

    and less rules

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    The poll was tampered with, options were edited!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by chef View Post
    Why ban all new mods just because 1 of 3 seems to abuse their power?
    It's a roll back - new mods destroyed the balance, the only way to be sure is to fully roll back. Nuking from orbit isn't an option at the moment so banning them all is the only way to sure.

    Any mod should get banned for a fairly long period of time - this way they'd appreciate what it is to be banned and thus, hopefully, appreciate that banning people is the last resort.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X