Reply to: Goodbye

[cojak]

[DaveB]

At least that proves that I'm not Admin!

Your not?

Damn!

Who the hell have I been sending all those PM's to then?

[cojak]

At least that proves that I'm not Admin!

[Xenophon]

You are welcome on this board Dave.

I'm not so sure - he is banned.

[cojak]

Way to stick the boot in to someone who cant reply. Top work.

Hey I was nice to someone who cant reply.

It cuts both ways, you know!

[DaveB]

Way to stick the boot in to someone who cant reply. Top work.

No you aren't being picked on.. We have opinions on here and as I said they're not all the same.

I thought you were MF because you sounded like him. I am happy to accept that you aren't.

You are welcome on this board Dave.

Then again, many of his other posts suggest that bullying masquerading as reasoned argument is the only thing he is capable of.
</sanctimony>

Sounds more like Gordon Brown to me.

[Troll]

<sanctimony>
Although I didn't see the original row in One a Day until it became apparent that Something Had Happened, once I did pop over there I had to conclude that MF was completely in the wrong.

The CUK forums have an administrator and a couple of moderators who ensure that standards are maintained. What those standards should be is a matter entirely at the discretion of administrator (with enforcement of said standards also delegated to the moderators).

To enter a long-running thread and castigate the creator and maintainer thereof on the basis that it doesn't accord with one's own ideas of what is appropriate to these forums is akin to entering another person's home and criticising the standards by which they run their household. It displays breathtaking arrogance, but more importantly it demonstrates absolute contempt for the person whose home it is.

Administrator has chosen to allow One a Day to continue its unbroken run of success, neatly tucked away where it belongs in LR. MF is entitled to his own opinions about what is "appropriate" or "professional"; but he is not entitled to strut about the place seeking to impose his opinions on others and, by implication, suggesting that administrator is not competent to administer her/its/his own forums.

Admin's house, admin's rules.

If MF doesn't like something on here because it fails to meet his exacting standards, he should communicate his opinion to admin and accept its/his/her verdict, rather than seeking to bully other members into submission.

Then again, many of his other posts suggest that bullying masquerading as reasoned argument is the only thing he is capable of.
</sanctimony>

You must be a barrel of laughs at work

[cojak]

No you aren't being picked on.. We have opinions on here and as I said they're not all the same.

I thought you were MF because you sounded like him. I am happy to accept that you aren't.

You are welcome on this board Dave.

[David Cameron]

I am not MF.

And I am not defending MF as I dont know all the details. But I am now running the risk of getting picked on like everyone else who crosses certain people on this board so I shall retreat.

Oh and I never claimed it was illegal, I dont know if MF did. But it does break the forum rules as I read them.

[cojak]

He posts links to pornographic (or semi pornographic) images in once a day and MF gave him his opinion on him doing that.

Nothing illegal about that MF, err... 'Dave' And you gave him a bit more than your opinion - you wanted him to admit he was wrong.

We all have have opinions MF/Dave, and (surprise, surprise) they're not always the same as yours.

And as for 'be professional - this is a contractor's site' - Light Relief is Light Relief. You want to be professional? Go to the PCG forums - (sometimes) they post in with their real names over there.

[David Cameron]

WTF is toolpusher?

He posts links to pornographic (or semi pornographic) images in once a day and MF gave him his opinion on him doing that.

[David Cameron]

<sanctimony>
Although I didn't see the original row in One a Day until it became apparent that Something Had Happened, once I did pop over there I had to conclude that MF was completely in the wrong.

The CUK forums have an administrator and a couple of moderators who ensure that standards are maintained. What those standards should be is a matter entirely at the discretion of administrator (with enforcement of said standards also delegated to the moderators).

To enter a long-running thread and castigate the creator and maintainer thereof on the basis that it doesn't accord with one's own ideas of what is appropriate to these forums is akin to entering another person's home and criticising the standards by which they run their household. It displays breathtaking arrogance, but more importantly it demonstrates absolute contempt for the person whose home it is.

Administrator has chosen to allow One a Day to continue its unbroken run of success, neatly tucked away where it belongs in LR. MF is entitled to his own opinions about what is "appropriate" or "professional"; but he is not entitled to strut about the place seeking to impose his opinions on others and, by implication, suggesting that administrator is not competent to administer her/its/his own forums.

Admin's house, admin's rules.

If MF doesn't like something on here because it fails to meet his exacting standards, he should communicate his opinion to admin and accept its/his/her verdict, rather than seeking to bully other members into submission.

Then again, many of his other posts suggest that bullying masquerading as reasoned argument is the only thing he is capable of.
</sanctimony>

Way to stick the boot in to someone who cant reply. Top work.

[snaw]

WTF is toolpusher?

[NickFitz]

<sanctimony>
Although I didn't see the original row in One a Day until it became apparent that Something Had Happened, once I did pop over there I had to conclude that MF was completely in the wrong.

The CUK forums have an administrator and a couple of moderators who ensure that standards are maintained. What those standards should be is a matter entirely at the discretion of administrator (with enforcement of said standards also delegated to the moderators).

To enter a long-running thread and castigate the creator and maintainer thereof on the basis that it doesn't accord with one's own ideas of what is appropriate to these forums is akin to entering another person's home and criticising the standards by which they run their household. It displays breathtaking arrogance, but more importantly it demonstrates absolute contempt for the person whose home it is.

Administrator has chosen to allow One a Day to continue its unbroken run of success, neatly tucked away where it belongs in LR. MF is entitled to his own opinions about what is "appropriate" or "professional"; but he is not entitled to strut about the place seeking to impose his opinions on others and, by implication, suggesting that administrator is not competent to administer her/its/his own forums.

Admin's house, admin's rules.

If MF doesn't like something on here because it fails to meet his exacting standards, he should communicate his opinion to admin and accept its/his/her verdict, rather than seeking to bully other members into submission.

Then again, many of his other posts suggest that bullying masquerading as reasoned argument is the only thing he is capable of.
</sanctimony>

[Stan.goodvibes]

Toolpusher.

Jeez it's just a forum for IT numpties. No-one takes it seriously.

Harden up!

Honestly.