- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Pseudo science, why no pseudo IT?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Pseudo science, why no pseudo IT?"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by xoggoth View PostLike a lot of "pseudo sciences" I suppose, there may be some truth in there somewhere. Perhaps there are patterns in weather
You can predict, to some degree and in some places, in the long range (e.g. seasonally) using well-known patterns that are closely connected to ocean-atmosphere teleconnections (ENSO, PDO, NAO etc.), but that's science, not pseudo-science.
Still, the above is definitely in cat lady territory. The trick with all these things is to plant a seed to bring in the punters. In this case, anecdotes about climate that have been collected over centuries in folklore, which are based on something - observation - so they're not useless. Still, they aren't going to trouble numerical weather prediction models and other scientific approaches at any forecast horizon. The reality is that computer models are pretty useless at forecasting beyond a small number of days in most places, because they are super-sensitive to small errors in the initial conditions (cf. chaos). So, at a certain forecast horizon, pseudo-scientific BS and proper science may be equally useless. The difference is that scientists wouldn't pretend otherwise, because they aren't looking for punters, on the whole
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by xoggoth View PostWhile on one of my walks I got talking to a guy who does websites. He told me about the bloke, client I think he said, on this site
WWT - Weather Without Technology - Welcome
Like a lot of "pseudo sciences" I suppose, there may be some truth in there somewhere. Perhaps there are patterns in weather, a cold February could be more likely to follow a dry January. I shall be checking. Not sure it's less accurate over the long term than usual weather forecasts.
Anyway, the chap has a lot of dedicated followers apparently. The main point is, could you lot be missing out on making some money here by focusing entirely on technology? Some people reject science and embrace "the other". I know some bright people who believe in acupuncture, homeopathy (aTW?), negative vibes etc.
What about an IT company that combines Visual C++ with spiritualism, orders a database according to the rules of Feng Shui etc. Doesn't matter if you don't believe it, you may attract clients!
Even Big Data is looking a bit old-hat these days.
Leave a comment:
-
Pseudo science, why no pseudo IT?
While on one of my walks I got talking to a guy who does websites. He told me about the bloke, client I think he said, on this site
WWT - Weather Without Technology - Welcome
Like a lot of "pseudo sciences" I suppose, there may be some truth in there somewhere. Perhaps there are patterns in weather, a cold February could be more likely to follow a dry January. I shall be checking. Not sure it's less accurate over the long term than usual weather forecasts.
Anyway, the chap has a lot of dedicated followers apparently. The main point is, could you lot be missing out on making some money here by focusing entirely on technology? Some people reject science and embrace "the other". I know some bright people who believe in acupuncture, homeopathy (aTW?), negative vibes etc.
What about an IT company that combines Visual C++ with spiritualism, orders a database according to the rules of Feng Shui etc. Doesn't matter if you don't believe it, you may attract clients!Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: