Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's ass
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Brain teasers, logic problems, etc.
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Brain teasers, logic problems, etc."
Collapse
-
+1 WSSOriginally posted by mudskipper View PostY = married, n = not married. ( -> = looking at)
Y -> ? -> N
Assuming married is a binary state, it's either
Y -> Y -> N
or
Y -> N -> N
either of the above makes the statement true.
Although not sure that married people should be looking at unmarried people quite so blatantly. Though shalt not covet thy neighbour's ass.
Leave a comment:
-
Y = married, n = not married. ( -> = looking at)
Y -> ? -> N
Assuming married is a binary state, it's either
Y -> Y -> N
or
Y -> N -> N
either of the above makes the statement true.
Although not sure that married people should be looking at unmarried people quite so blatantly. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's ass.
Leave a comment:
-
Brain teasers, logic problems, etc.
Which one is wearing a dog collar?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LondonManc View PostOne that I came across the other day:
Albert is looking at Brian. Brian is looking at Charlie. Albert is married. Charlie is not.
"A married person is looking directly at an unmarried person."
Is the above statement is true?
A) Yes
B) No
C) Not enough information to be certain
Just post your answer initially, reasons can follow later.
Yes.
Leave a comment:
-
Brain teasers, logic problems, etc.
One that I came across the other day:
Albert is looking at Brian. Brian is looking at Charlie. Albert is married. Charlie is not.
"A married person is looking directly at an unmarried person."
Is the above statement is true?
A) Yes
B) No
C) Not enough information to be certain
Just post your answer initially, reasons can follow later.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Yesterday 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50
- Cloned again: an umbrella company founder's warning on fraud, JSL and Companies House Jul 15 07:47
- How is JSL bedding in for contractor umbrella companies, 100 days in? Jul 14 07:45
- IT contractor demand cools in June 2026 amid UK heatwave Jul 13 08:18
- How could zero hours contract reform create unexpected problems for contractors? Jul 8 06:40
- Three Loan Charge conflicts of interest show Labour ministers knew the McCann Review was compromised from the start Jul 7 05:44
- What’s happening with HMRC off-payroll working enforcement? (IR35 update) Jul 6 08:20


Leave a comment: