- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Outside IR35 &interviewing potential employees"
Collapse
-
I have interviewed before and never had an issue with it. As others have said this alone would not put you inside IR35. On the flip side, if you refuse it could annoy your manager and see you as being awkward. All depends on what your manager is like though. Never can tell.
-
Personally I don't see it as a problem. You were hired as an expert consultancy. There's no reason you can't/shouldn't apply those skills as part of your service to deliver whatever you're contracted to deliver.
If you had a builder onsite and needed a sparky to do some stuff, you'd reasonably assume the builder would have more technical skills to be able to judge if the sparky knew wtf they were doing as they likely have some domain knowledge.
As long as it's incidental, and you're not spending days interviewing I'd have thought you were OK.
Leave a comment:
-
I’d say no, “sorry i’m external so can’t be involved in employee recruitment processes etc.”
Leave a comment:
-
In itself, it doesn't necessarily mean much if you have particular expertise that you are contracted to provide and this interview relies on it.
On the other hand, from what you've written, I would strongly suggest you take a long hard look at this relationship, possibly with independent advice, to see whether it remains outside IR35. The hypothetical contract can easily move from outside to inside over a long period of time as the lines become blurred (length of contract in itself, is irrelevant, but it can be correlated with things that are relevant). I assume it is Ch. 10, but that doesn't mean you're in the clear in terms of liability, BTW.
Leave a comment:
-
I agree with vwdan that this task isn't inherently inside IR35. However, I'm guessing that this isn't part of the scope of work that you agreed to at the start of the contract.
I think the question then becomes how significant it is. E.g. if someone turned up for interview a bit early, and the person they needed to meet wasn't available, I don't think there would be any problem with you going down to reception to meet them. On the other hand, if the whole process could take up several days of billable time, that suggests that the client is treating you like an employee who they can re-assign to different tasks at will.
Leave a comment:
-
Like anything IR35, it's not black and white. I don't see that there is anything inherent about interviewing that points to you being Inside IR35 - it may be an indicator that you've become part and parcel, but it's not going to make or break the question alone.
I've interviewed a few times, though normally for my own replacement
My advice - think carefully about how you stand currently. If you're confident this is clearly an outside IR35 role in practice, then I wouldn't worry about it.
Leave a comment:
-
Outside IR35 &interviewing potential employees
Hi,
I am currently engaged on an outside IR35 contract and have been asked by my client to take part in interviewing for a new employee. I am concerned that this would not be compliant with an outside IR35 contract, but I’m not sure. I’ve worked with the client for a few years and would like to be helpful, but don’t want to put myself at risk. My instinct is that I shouldn’t do anything that I have any doubts about.
Has anyone else experienced something similar?
Many thanks,
TTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Today 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Yesterday 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44

Leave a comment: