• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Is an Employment Tribunal binding over HMRC?"

Collapse

  • JohntheBike
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    Sadly those that do post here have to use the ignore button to avoid you inane and 18 years out of date ramblings...
    doesn't alter the fact that there are many who support my out of date ramblings as you put it. So I'll continue with my ramblings. If you ignore them, all well and good. It's only my opinion which will be visible.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by JohntheBike View Post
    there are many who wouldn't agree with you! But they choose not to post here.
    Sadly those that do post here have to use the ignore button to avoid you inane and 18 years out of date ramblings...

    Leave a comment:


  • JohntheBike
    replied
    Originally posted by BR14 View Post
    feck all to do with either, just a tedious, boring feckwit.
    there are many who wouldn't agree with you! But they choose not to post here.

    Leave a comment:


  • BR14
    replied
    Originally posted by Lance View Post
    Hard of thinking.
    Unable to reason another person's considered view.
    Continue to bang on the same old idea, that's been fairly well poopooed.

    All potential signs of age, but Alzheimer's.
    feck all to do with either, just a tedious, boring feckwit.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by JohntheBike View Post
    perhaps I've just got a level of Alzheimer's then? It comes with old age.
    Hard of thinking.
    Unable to reason another person's considered view.
    Continue to bang on the same old idea, that's been fairly well poopooed.

    All potential signs of age, but Alzheimer's.

    Leave a comment:


  • JohntheBike
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    perhaps I've just got a level of Alzheimer's then? It comes with old age.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    Given you mentioned the case here

    https://www.contractoruk.com/forums/...ml#post2655651

    Not sure feigning ignorance is working in your favour
    And here

    https://www.contractoruk.com/forums/...ml#post2655603
    and here

    https://www.contractoruk.com/forums/...rn#post2654615

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    Given you mentioned the case here

    https://www.contractoruk.com/forums/...ml#post2655651

    Not sure feigning ignorance is working in your favour
    And here

    https://www.contractoruk.com/forums/...ml#post2655603

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by JohntheBike View Post
    Was it dissected here on CUK?
    Given you mentioned the case here

    https://www.contractoruk.com/forums/...ml#post2655651

    Not sure feigning ignorance is working in your favour

    Leave a comment:


  • Jolie
    replied
    Originally posted by JohntheBike View Post
    Was it dissected here on CUK?
    I couldn't find anything, which is why I started this thread.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by JohntheBike View Post
    link?
    Google?

    Mr A Elbourn v The Met Office and Qualserve Consulting Ltd: 1400977/2018 - GOV.UK

    Leave a comment:


  • JohntheBike
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    Google not working for you?
    I was looking for the CUK debate, which I seemed to have missed, or forgotten.

    Leave a comment:


  • JohntheBike
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    Less than 2 seconds on google gives me Mr A Elbourn v The Met Office and Qualserve Consulting Ltd: 1400977/2018 - GOV.UK as the first link.
    Was it dissected here on CUK?

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by JohntheBike View Post
    link?
    Google not working for you?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X