• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Resource solution

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Resource solution"

Collapse

  • CanPayButWouldRatherNot
    replied
    For those at DB thru resource solutions

    some folks might have missed the thread here


    https://www.contractoruk.com/forums/...ml#post2736540

    yours worriedly re-reading a re-issued contract

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by oliverson View Post
    No, and this is what really p155es me off. Talk about abusing a dominant position. So, the public sector, unable to find contractors willing to work inside IR35, magically lift the rates. I've seen contract rates usually around £ 400-450 suddenly advertised at £ 650. Who's paying for this? The taxpayer. Isn't that anti-competitive for other companies who can't pick the taxpayers pockets? Where does that leave small/medium companies? Unable to afford the contractors they need because the pubic (yes correct spelling) sector has just shafted them on rates. They came after Microsoft in the 90's and 00's for abusing their dominant market position. How come nobody is attacking the Revenue for the same?
    Not sure what you're on about but he said that his role was tested and deemed outside.

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Originally posted by Moomin View Post
    Sorry, not sure what thread to post in, but I'm not confident about my agency.

    They are talking about meeting with the client/legal, me probably being outside IR35 and them sending me an amended contract by the end of the month if the client confirms this.

    Surely amendments won't count at this point as I signed the original contract.
    If the amendment is not accepted, my guess is that they’ll terminate your contract and remind you not to hit yer arse on the door on the way out.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Sorry, not sure what thread to post in, but I'm not confident about my agency.

    They are talking about meeting with the client/legal, me probably being outside IR35 and them sending me an amended contract by the end of the month if the client confirms this.

    Surely amendments won't count at this point as I signed the original contract.
    Last edited by Moomin; 8 January 2020, 07:32.

    Leave a comment:


  • krytonsheep
    replied
    Originally posted by ciaozio View Post
    It's unfair that they want to pay me half my rate for the same work I'm doing now. It's unfair not being even assessed. It's unfair being bullied into a contract with the usual reminder "hey the market is dead please accept".
    Your client is a business, it uses suppliers to provide goods and services. The business decides what services it needs and what price it's willing to pay for them. The nature of business is always to pay the least amount possible to suppliers. The only exceptions to this would be if you are a 'fair trade' farmer from Kenya ( as an example).
    As a supplier of services, it's your responsibility to find the highest paying client, fairness never comes in to it.

    Leave a comment:


  • oliverson
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    Public sector seem to be coping with it from what I've heard. Just been chatting with a contractor who was in an outside IR35 role before his current gig. PRivate sector should be able to fix itself quicker than public you'd hope.
    No, and this is what really p155es me off. Talk about abusing a dominant position. So, the public sector, unable to find contractors willing to work inside IR35, magically lift the rates. I've seen contract rates usually around £ 400-450 suddenly advertised at £ 650. Who's paying for this? The taxpayer. Isn't that anti-competitive for other companies who can't pick the taxpayers pockets? Where does that leave small/medium companies? Unable to afford the contractors they need because the pubic (yes correct spelling) sector has just shafted them on rates. They came after Microsoft in the 90's and 00's for abusing their dominant market position. How come nobody is attacking the Revenue for the same?

    Leave a comment:


  • zonkkk
    replied
    Originally posted by ciaozio View Post
    The world changes and I'll adapt or leave if needed.
    Careful, I heard the other side is full of experienced contractors. Your chances of finding a contract will be close to zero.

    Leave a comment:


  • ciaozio
    replied
    Originally posted by GhostofTarbera View Post
    Remember, if they have an Adam’s Apple it’s a bloke


    Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK Forum
    LOL! It's with my Gf

    Originally posted by eek View Post
    What's unfair? The world changes and you have to identify a new place in it.
    It's unfair that they want to pay me half my rate for the same work I'm doing now. It's unfair not being even assessed. It's unfair being bullied into a contract with the usual reminder "hey the market is dead please accept".

    The world changes and I'll adapt or leave if needed. But don't tell me there's nothing unfair about this.
    Last edited by ciaozio; 3 January 2020, 13:09.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Public sector seem to be coping with it from what I've heard. Just been chatting with a contractor who was in an outside IR35 role before his current gig. PRivate sector should be able to fix itself quicker than public you'd hope.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by ciaozio View Post
    I'm fortunate enough to have built a war-chest large enough to able to reject their offer. Which is why I'm rejecting and I'll try to find something outside IR35 and work on personal projects for the next few months. Plus a much needed trip to Asia.

    I find the whole thing incredibly unfair.
    What's unfair? The world changes and you have to identify a new place in it.

    That's not unfair it's what happens daily.

    Leave a comment:


  • Anubis
    replied
    Originally posted by GhostofTarbera View Post
    Remember, if they have an Adam’s Apple it’s a bloke

    Leave a comment:


  • GhostofTarbera
    replied
    Originally posted by ciaozio View Post
    Plus a much needed trip to Asia.

    .
    Remember, if they have an Adam’s Apple it’s a bloke


    Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK Forum

    Leave a comment:


  • ciaozio
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    Depends on your location surely? You're on more with a bad rate than no rate.
    I'm fortunate enough to have built a war-chest large enough to able to reject their offer. Which is why I'm rejecting and I'll try to find something outside IR35 and work on personal projects for the next few months. Plus a much needed trip to Asia.

    I find the whole thing incredibly unfair.

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Originally posted by hairymouse View Post
    Similar thing happened to me in October. Wouldn't give me penny more on my daily rate for a renewal, so screw them. Rate was way too low at £450 per day anyway.

    After 3 months on the bench and almost nothing in the pipeline, I'd take any contract at £300
    The rate shouldn’t be the issue. Getting out of a contract that moves you from outside to inside should be the issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • hairymouse
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    It's January 2nd - and most job sites have timed out all adverts over Christmas. I would be waiting until January 13th before starting to give up hope - let business get started up again.
    You are right, and thanks for the words of encouragement. Actually, today wasn't too bad, got a few calls.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X