Originally posted by Lance
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: A blind eye?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "A blind eye?"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View PostIf I understand correctly, this can only be good for the contractor because the tax debt belongs to the engager under the new rules if a contractor is declared by the engager as outside IR35? Quids in, no need for IPSE or QDOS fees.
I'd always keep my insurances current.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SussexSeagull View PostI can well believe a Government Department would put someone outside of IR35 if they deemed them too important to lose (of which a DV contractor certainly might be) but how the HMRC see it is another story.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Jenki View PostAn accountant friend told her recently that one of his clients had told him that Contractors working at an intelligence agency in south west England were leaving at unprecedented rates/numbers and that to stem the flow HMRC were not enforcing IR35! He went on to say nothing was formalised, (nothing in writing. etc.) I wonder if could this be true, has anyone else heard of this? Or is it nonsense?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SussexSeagull View PostI can well believe a Government Department would put someone outside of IR35 if they deemed them too important to lose (of which a DV contractor certainly might be) but how the HMRC see it is another story.
Leave a comment:
-
I can well believe a Government Department would put someone outside of IR35 if they deemed them too important to lose (of which a DV contractor certainly might be) but how the HMRC see it is another story.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Qdos Contractor View PostWe've had plenty in the past but not aware of any recent instances (i.e. post 6th April).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by fannyadams View PostSlightly OT, but I heard that some ex-HMRC contractors are facing IR35 investigations - is this something you're aware of?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Qdos Contractor View PostBear in mind that the off payroll rules only apply to organisations covered by the FOI act. Some agencies naturally fall outside of that.
Leave a comment:
-
Bear in mind that the off payroll rules only apply to organisations covered by the FOI act. Some agencies naturally fall outside of that.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostI can't believe this. IR35 is always there, it's a tax law. Whether they were ignoring the inside/outside argument maybe but not enforcing IR35 doesn't make sense. Personally I'd completely ignore it as unfounded tittle tattle.
As you say, it's tax law - and if HMRC think they can get money from it, they will chase for it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Jenki View PostMy partner was a contractor with her own Ltd company prior to IR35 rearing its ugly head. She is now working under an umbrella company. An accountant friend told her recently that one of his clients had told him that Contractors working at an intelligence agency in south west England were leaving at unprecedented rates/numbers and that to stem the flow HMRC were not enforcing IR35! He went on to say nothing was formalised, (nothing in writing. etc.) I wonder if could this be true, has anyone else heard of this? Or is it nonsense? How could one find out.. FOI act? Assuming it was true could the information be used for the benefit of other contractors suffering under IR35.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SussexSeagull View PostI have long wondered how the HMRC could investigate a DV role (which working for an intelligence agency probably is). Unless they have a special unit for dealing with such roles I can't imagine the client or contractor can really say too much about what they do day to day!
Some years back, I was working with someone who claimed to have lost his IR35 case because GCHQ wouldn't help his defence at all. Whether his claim is true or not, I don't know, but that was his story.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SussexSeagull View PostI have long wondered how the HMRC could investigate a DV role (which working for an intelligence agency probably is). Unless they have a special unit for dealing with such roles I can't imagine the client or contractor can really say too much about what they do day to day!
Leave a comment:
-
I have long wondered how the HMRC could investigate a DV role (which working for an intelligence agency probably is). Unless they have a special unit for dealing with such roles I can't imagine the client or contractor can really say too much about what they do day to day!
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: