• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "It's Not Fine -- Specific Flaws With the New IR35 Tool"

Collapse

  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by DaveB View Post
    HMRC don't have an issue with PSB's using contractors, they just want us all paying tax like permies. Pressuring the PSB's with things like the status tool and behind the scenes comm's to execs are the means to the end.
    Nope HMRC do have a problem with contractors - and its a simple one. They don't understand that we are not employees and are trying to pigeon everyone as if they were employees even when they are not.

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    Not quite. HMRC are actively trying to dissuade PS bodies from recruiting contractors....
    HMRC don't have an issue with PSB's using contractors, they just want us all paying tax like permies. Pressuring the PSB's with things like the status tool and behind the scenes comm's to execs are the means to the end.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    Not quite. HMRC are actively trying to dissuade PS bodies from recruiting contractors....
    What do they want, green graduate consultants on three times the price for 10% of the skills and experience?

    Leave a comment:


  • RonBW
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    So, get a QDOS outside declaration, working practices agreed outside and there will be a good chance you'll win a court case?
    If your working practices are outside then you will win the case every time (on the presumption that you have competent lawyers)

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by DaveB View Post
    In theory yes, in practice who knows. HMRC are actively encouraging PS bodies to throw their contractors under a bus with regard to IR35.
    Not quite. HMRC are actively trying to dissuade PS bodies from recruiting contractors....

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    So, get a QDOS outside declaration, working practices agreed outside and there will be a good chance you'll win a court case?
    In theory yes, in practice who knows. HMRC are actively encouraging PS bodies to throw their contractors under a bus with regard to IR35.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by DaveB View Post
    Not just us who have issue with it.

    Accounting Web - IR35 Tool test Drive

    Needs registration to read the full article but they aren't spammy.

    Summary is that it is inaccurate, doesn't follow or simply ignores case law, displays HMRC bias towards employment and should not be relied upon regardless of the answer given.
    So, get a QDOS outside declaration, working practices agreed outside and there will be a good chance you'll win a court case?

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Not just us who have issue with it.

    Accounting Web - IR35 Tool test Drive

    Needs registration to read the full article but they aren't spammy.

    Summary is that it is inaccurate, doesn't follow or simply ignores case law, displays HMRC bias towards employment and should not be relied upon regardless of the answer given.

    Leave a comment:


  • RonBW
    replied
    Originally posted by DaveB View Post
    The Beta is the live tool.

    Since GDS got hold of anything web related in Govt. everything is Beta now.

    Yes, I know.
    I meant that the article came out very quickly for it to be used on the live tool, so was asking whether it was done against the HMRC ESS site (which says beta) or whether it was against the private beta tests that went on.

    Given the date on the article, I would guess that it was against the private beta rather than the public live (beta)

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Originally posted by RonBW View Post
    Given the date on that post, was it referring to the beta or the live version of the tool?

    I know I've read something on their site which was about the beta, which looks similar to this post, but they may have done the same tests with the live tool as well.
    The Beta is the live tool.

    Since GDS got hold of anything web related in Govt. everything is Beta now.

    Yes, I know.

    Leave a comment:


  • RonBW
    replied
    Given the date on that post, was it referring to the beta or the live version of the tool?

    I know I've read something on their site which was about the beta, which looks similar to this post, but they may have done the same tests with the live tool as well.
    Last edited by Contractor UK; 12 October 2018, 21:51.

    Leave a comment:


  • MPwannadecentincome
    replied
    story from Contractor Calculator

    .......

    How does the tool perform using real cases?

    ContractorCalculator put each of the 21 historical IR35 court cases through HMRC’s tool and the conclusions are:

    For 27% of the court cases, HMRC simply says “Unknown”
    10% of cases are being given a pass despite a judge failing the case in court.

    Further testing of common scenarios also revealed some surprising results:

    Contractors who are significantly controlled, or moved about from task to task without it being in their contract, can pass the test, contrary to what the case law says. There is no case law to support this. “Tail-end Charlies” should be classic fails
    A significant number of project based contractors who should easily pass the test, are given the status “unknown”.
    Whilst it appears that the tool is now hooked up to an analysis engine it is still failing to cover key areas of employment case law and is simply not fit-for-purpose.
    Last edited by Contractor UK; 12 October 2018, 21:50.

    Leave a comment:


  • Andy Hallett
    replied
    Originally posted by Quality View Post
    Has anybody actually got their PSB to go through the tool with them and come up with a sensible decision based on the result? My client is indecisive and risk averse and despite talking about IR35 for weeks they have so far failed to use the tool for any of the contractors on-site, despite saying for weeks that is what they will do.

    With my 2 weeks notice period they have only effectively got until next Friday to make a determination, or I could just walk out on 31st March and not return (will be paid on 5th April for that).

    Would be nice to see some PSBs actually using and accepting the result of the tool on an individual basis.
    Yes, the vast majority of our clients have been doing this.

    Leave a comment:


  • Quality
    replied
    Time is ebbing away

    Has anybody actually got their PSB to go through the tool with them and come up with a sensible decision based on the result? My client is indecisive and risk averse and despite talking about IR35 for weeks they have so far failed to use the tool for any of the contractors on-site, despite saying for weeks that is what they will do.

    With my 2 weeks notice period they have only effectively got until next Friday to make a determination, or I could just walk out on 31st March and not return (will be paid on 5th April for that).

    Would be nice to see some PSBs actually using and accepting the result of the tool on an individual basis.

    Leave a comment:


  • willendure
    replied


    This must be the most thoroughly tested piece of software HMRC have ever produced, thanks to all the experts on here putting it through its paces.

    Can you all do the same for Basic PAYE Tools? I haven't submitted a PAYE return in a good while - not had time to try and fix that pile of crap since it stopped working a while back.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X