Originally posted by cojak
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Another IR35 Public sector question
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Another IR35 Public sector question"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by cojak View PostCould you put the link in one of your placeholder posts int the 'What's changed?' please eek?
I would do it but Netiquette prevents me
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by eek View PostSee the link nluk posted.
The thing to remember is that the law has been written not to catch people and companies but to stop departments creating false "consultancies" to get round the rules.
Yes, the rules have the side effect of catching people supplied through consultancies but I don't believe that is the purpose of this rule. The purpose is to ensure the obvious tricks a department could use to get round the rules can't be used.
I would do it but Netiquette prevents me
Leave a comment:
-
See the link nluk posted.
The thing to remember is that the law has been written not to catch people and companies but to stop departments creating false "consultancies" to get round the rules.
Yes, the rules have the side effect of catching people supplied through consultancies but I don't believe that is the purpose of this rule. The purpose is to ensure the obvious tricks a department could use to get round the rules can't be used.
Leave a comment:
-
Obviously plenty of people like you so there are a few articles about it and a very long thread started by psychocandy on the same topic.
Here is one of the articles. I think there are some others linked in PC's thread.
http://www.contractoruk.com/news/001...re_caught.html
Also check the search function in the FAQ section telling you how to use Google to search the forums. This has been covered in some of the threads but they are huge so might be hard to find.
You are very late to the party so need to do a lot of reading very quickly.
Leave a comment:
-
What difference do you think your girlfriend doing your admin makes?
Leave a comment:
-
Another IR35 Public sector question
I have a limited company and I'm currently contracted via an agency to a large private sector company that is working on a project that provides a service to a central Government department.
I'm confused, whilst I'm technically working in the public sector, I'm working via a private sector client.
My contract has all the usual goodies such as a substitution clause and I also employ my girlfriend to do all my admin etc.
My main question is, do the rule apply to only those working directly in the public sector, i.e. directly to the public sector department (albeit via an agent), or does the rule apply to people contracting to a private sector company working on government projects?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Yesterday 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
Leave a comment: