Originally posted by Snooky
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: A question about recovery of money
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "A question about recovery of money"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by lilikins1 View Post
hi do you have the contact details of a reputable tax advisor that can help me negotiate please
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by woody1 View PostExactly what cojak says.
Forget going after scheme operators. Forget fighting HMRC.
Accept that you'll have to pay. Arrange a payment plan* (time to pay) if you need to. Move on with your life.
* there's usually no problem getting HMRC to agree to a few years to pay but they have been known to allow over 10 years
Leave a comment:
-
In this podcast Dan Neidle explains that tax avoidance cowboys have no consequences by promoting these schemes, he proposes replacing the rules of cricket with the laws of criminality.
https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcas...=1000663976056
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by anandb View PostHumm
There is no way as a common man can challenge this to HMRC?
local MPs are mostly useless so no point in talking to them.
HMRC wont buzz on their stand.
The internet on the original sum is almost 50%.
So the moral of the story is - do the scam by the books. HMRC wont do that tang to you.. Is that what looks like it.
Some local MPs are better than others, I know of a couple of MPs who worked with their constituents and wrote to HMRC, but the responses from HMRC were generic and unhelpful (at best)
Leave a comment:
-
Humm
There is no way as a common man can challenge this to HMRC?
local MPs are mostly useless so no point in talking to them.
HMRC wont buzz on their stand.
The interest on the original sum is almost 50%.
It is frustrating.. there is no process.. only choice is to hire expensive solicitor to fight the case.
So the moral of the story is - do the scam by the books. HMRC wont do that tang to you.. Is that what looks like it.
Leave a comment:
-
Humm
There is no way as a common man can challenge this to HMRC?
local MPs are mostly useless so no point in talking to them.
HMRC wont buzz on their stand.
The internet on the original sum is almost 50%.
So the moral of the story is - do the scam by the books. HMRC wont do that tang to you.. Is that what looks like it.
Leave a comment:
-
And even then they only put those names up for one year before taking them off the list. You’ve just got to hope that contractors Google the names before signing up.
Leave a comment:
-
And the thing is, the disguised remuneration legislation HMRC brought in, at the same time as the Loan Charge, is all encompassing. It's therefore difficult to see how the schemes now aren't anything other than outright evasion. And yet, all HMRC seems to be able to do is publish their names. Pathetic!
Leave a comment:
-
Judging by the number of new schemes that keep popping up, it seems HMRC are still not on top of this problem after 20-odd years.
Leave a comment:
-
Quackhandle had a question:
Originally posted by quackhandle View PostOkay dumb question alert, but why doesn't HMRC go after the owners of these companies?
qh
Originally posted by cojak View Post
I guess that according to current legislation they’ve done nothing illegal, the onus is on contractors to get this stuff right.
The salesmen and agencies who knowingly push contractors into these schemes for a fat commission should be the easiest targets for fines and sanctions IMO.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Is it legal to work remotely from Europe via a UK company? Today 22:44
- Autumn Budget 2025 set for Nov 26, ‘putting contractors on watch’ Yesterday 15:13
- November 2025 Companies House ID rules contractors must follow Sep 3 19:12
- When agencies sink with your contractor invoice: a legal guide Sep 2 17:14
- Reeves ‘to raise VAT registration threshold to £100,000’ Sep 1 06:37
- When your agency shuts: a recruiter’s 5 tips if you’re unpaid Aug 29 06:57
- What the 2025 employment status review means for contractors Aug 28 06:39
- Contractors, Autumn Budget 2025 is set to extend the big income tax freeze Aug 27 07:15
- Labour to run employment status consultation ‘before 2026’ Aug 26 05:03
- Contractors, AI is making the CV’s death knell louder Aug 22 22:13
Leave a comment: