Originally posted by piebaps
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: If you have used Montpelier - read this
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "If you have used Montpelier - read this"
Collapse
-
-
-
-
Leave a comment:
-
Old story that. Published on 18 October and there are links to the Court judgement on which the article is based elsewhere in this forum.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by piebaps View PostMr & Mrs G
Millions of client funds diverted | News |
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by FunkyMoped View PostAnyone else get a letter from Montp in recent weeks talking about developments in another case which might be advantageous?
I've long failed to believe a word they say.
I hope no-one hears from him again. I am very sure this is what will happen. Others disagree and I have been known to be wrong.
Leave a comment:
-
Anyone else get a letter from Montp in recent weeks talking about developments in another case which might be advantageous?
I've long failed to believe a word they say.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by More Lamb View PostI wonder if these sums came from loan scheme users repaying 10% of their loans?
I do wonder if there are any scheme users who have not heard the latest and still trust WG? And I wonder what DB thinks of WG now? Will DB be in the firing line?
I suppose its too early to tell.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by FlorenceP View PostThe companies that deal with the loans, Corrance and Hazelmere I think they are called, are not part of Montpelier Group
g. Some key payments are highlighted at JPM/3/264-266 of the RBS accounts which, by way of example show payments from clients/investors, coming in on 2/1/19 from Hazelmere Ltd of £40,000 and on the same day being a paid out into MP Gittins account; a further £40,000 comes in on 4/1/19 from the same entity and on 6/1/19 £2000 is ; £15,000 in on 18/1/19 and paid out to MP Gittins £10,000 paid out to MP Gittins on the same day. There are a very large number of payments over a considerable period of time with at least a correlation between clients monies and payments to the family. These payments were from the LLC account the statement for which were being sent to the Defendant at its registered address [see JPM/1/460]. In the absence of a dispute that these sums aswell as others totalling £1.1million and EU1.1.m, were paid to the EWG family, it does not seem necessary to go beyond these examples.
I wonder if these sums came from loan scheme users repaying 10% of their loans?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostFollowing a link from the link https://www.iomfsa.im/media/2636/chanceryprocedure.pdf
16:15(page 12)
even cursory reference to those bank statements would have informed the directors of the Defendant that payments made from the bank accounts of BIOM, LLC and MICI included personal expenditure of EWG and his family (for example, the purchase of racehorses by EWGs' wife and son, the payment to the Isle of Man Courts of Justice of a £700,000 security for costs order made against Montpelier Tax Planning (Isle of Man) Limited – noted by the Staff of Government Division as having been paid personally by EWG, hundreds of payments to EWG, his wife Maura Gittins, his son Mark Gittins and his son Ellis Gittins);
So far this seems to be civil courts. How long until this turns into a criminal investigation?
I have been waiting years for this.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: