- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Duke of Westminster
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Duke of Westminster"
Collapse
-
Wasnt there a huge tax case involving the grosvesnor estates and their structure about 80 years ago?
-
The law in this area also says that if you "gift" assets to another person but continue to enjoy those assets or the fruits of those assets, then the gift can be ignored and you are treated as though you own the assets.
There are ways to separate the ownership of the assets and the fruits of ownership. These have varied over the years as fashions change and have included UK trusts, offshore trusts, family partnerships etc.
There have been tax cases seeking to strike down some of these schemes. Some HMRC has won, some they have lost.
However the intention of Parliament is that continuing to enjoy the fruits of ownership should mean that the gift is regarded as ineffective.
I suspect with a fortune the size of this one however, they could probably afford to put aside a hundred million or so to look after the old man and not make a serious dent in the portfolio.
Leave a comment:
-
Couldn't agree more! When you think about it for a minute the 7 year gifting rule is pretty arbitrary and is more realistic for the very wealthy. I sure don't intend leaving any money to HMRC when I die!Originally posted by AtW View PostIt's the law - gift your stuff to somebody (including trust), live 7 more years and there is no IHT.
IMHO there should be no IHT in the first place.
Leave a comment:
-
It's the law - gift your stuff to somebody (including trust), live 7 more years and there is no IHT.
IMHO there should be no IHT in the first place.
Leave a comment:
-
And the above is merely a consequence of political decisions at the top.Originally posted by eek View PostNo one in HMRC has the yearly target to get £3bn in inheritance tax from the Westminster estate
Entire departments have a individual yearly target to collect money from loan schemes.
Please understand it's about the message, not the financial fallout (which, like for IR35, is laughable).
And the message is: "tax avoidance" is reserved for the members of the Club. If you (plebs) partake in something reserved for members of the Club without belonging to the Club, there will be endless punishment to suffer.
Leave a comment:
-
No one in HMRC has the yearly target to get £3bn in inheritance tax from the Westminster estateOriginally posted by webberg View PostDuke of Westminster "legal" IHT arrangement likely to avoid £3.9bn of tax. HMRC unlikely to challenge.
Contractor schemes likely to bring in less than £500m (according to our model). HMRC throwing the kitchen sink - paid for by taxpayer funds.
Go figure.
Entire departments have a individual yearly target to collect money from loan schemes.
Leave a comment:
-
Give stuff to your offspring, live seven years beyond that, and there's no inheritance tax. AIUI the trust arrangement is to prevent them wasting it.
Leave a comment:
-
Duke of Westminster "legal" IHT arrangement likely to avoid £3.9bn of tax. HMRC unlikely to challenge.
Contractor schemes likely to bring in less than £500m (according to our model). HMRC throwing the kitchen sink - paid for by taxpayer funds.
Go figure.
Leave a comment:
-
Not individually but collectively it wouldn't take much to create the mother of all fighting funds.Originally posted by eek View PostThe fact it was used by people to increase their take home pay also means that no one has the money to push HMRC into court when HMRC starts asking for money.
I wouldn't be surprised if more than 50,000 contractors have used loan schemes.
If everyone chipped in £1,000...
Of course, for various reasons, it will never happen.
Leave a comment:
-
No it's a carefully created over the long term plan that actually works and has the money to fight any attempts to tax it.Originally posted by WTFH View PostWill the DoW's tax affairs have an impact on contractors who have used trusts in the past to reduce their taxes?
Inheritance tax, and how the Dukes of Westminster avoid it on their £9bn fortune
The typical contractor scheme was insane, half baked (at best) and sold by spivs to people who were scared by ir35 into joining said madcap scheme. The fact it was used by people to increase their take home pay also means that no one has the money to push HMRC into court when HMRC starts asking for money.
Leave a comment:
-
No, because only little people pay taxesOriginally posted by WTFH View PostWill the DoW's tax affairs have an impact on contractors who have used trusts in the past to reduce their taxes?
Inheritance tax, and how the Dukes of Westminster avoid it on their £9bn fortune
Leave a comment:
-
Duke of Westminster
Will the DoW's tax affairs have an impact on contractors who have used trusts in the past to reduce their taxes?
Inheritance tax, and how the Dukes of Westminster avoid it on their £9bn fortuneTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Today 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Yesterday 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36
- The JSL legislation we’ll surely get just dropped. Here’s 4 ‘indelibles’ Dec 10 07:26

Leave a comment: