Originally posted by zeitghost
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: What are you?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "What are you?"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by vwdan View PostPeople seem to take CUK really seriously - for a while, when considering going contracting, I was worried that people in real life would be similar to some of the people here.
Leave a comment:
-
I don't understand the question.
[nor do I fully get why GG gets so many people's back up]
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TykeMerc View PostNope, but a significant number of "new" posters are, you've even admitted that the Unix persona is simply the return of the many times perma banned Kandr/Russell.
Banning on CUK is utterly meaningless with the number of sockies.
Am I upset that I've "upset" the GG persona? Not in the tiniest bit, I loathe dishonesty.
There are some sockies that are created for comedy and entertainment value that make the rest of CUK smile, but the GG type are just some sad sack lying or trolling and add nothing to the place other than noise.
Leave a comment:
-
People seem to take CUK really seriously - for a while, when considering going contracting, I was worried that people in real life would be similar to some of the people here.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TykeMerc View PostNope, but a significant number of "new" posters are, you've even admitted that the Unix persona is simply the return of the many times perma banned Kandr/Russell.
Banning on CUK is utterly meaningless with the number of sockies.
Am I upset that I've "upset" the GG persona? Not in the tiniest bit, I loathe dishonesty.
There are some sockies that are created for comedy and entertainment value that make the rest of CUK smile, but the GG type are just some sad sack lying or trolling and add nothing to the place other than noise.
Leave a comment:
-
I quite like threads about odd stuff, makes a change from all the stuff about UKIP, EU, immigration, Islam etc. People can always ignore threads that bore them so trolls should only be a problem if they abuse others on CUK. Its only the rude f* a* like sasguru, mos and TykeMerc I can't stand.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Unix View PostTykeMerc thinks everyone is a sockie, I'm sure he will accuse me of being a sockie next.
Banning on CUK is utterly meaningless with the number of sockies.
Am I upset that I've "upset" the GG persona? Not in the tiniest bit, I loathe dishonesty.
There are some sockies that are created for comedy and entertainment value that make the rest of CUK smile, but the GG type are just some sad sack lying or trolling and add nothing to the place other than noise.
Leave a comment:
-
databasing - every day is a day to learn more - keep ahead of the bobs and co
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Gittins Gal View PostYou're just a really unpleasant bully.
You jump on to every post I make to abuse me.
And if you're goal is to upset me, well congratulations. It's working.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by TykeMerc View PostNot someone who creates endless boring sockpuppets, which spout dull fiction and have stupid affectations in the typing style. Oh also not a fake female or an inveterate liar.Originally posted by TykeMerc View PostBut I'm NOT Christian and that sockpuppet creator is definitely NOT female.
I can't imagine even the most obsessed tosser that's come up with that pathetic affectation thinks it's "cute" not after so many people have pointed out it's just stupid.
You jump on to every post I make to abuse me.
And if you're goal is to upset me, well congratulations. It's working.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View Post"She" gets a right strop on if you pull her up on "her" "cute" spellings via the rep system.
Apparently leaving negative rep is "not Christian"
I can't imagine even the most obsessed tosser that's come up with that pathetic affectation thinks it's "cute" not after so many people have pointed out it's just stupid.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: