Originally posted by Helios
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Lame Avatars ????
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Lame Avatars ????"
Collapse
-
Well of course I wear tights. Cross garters would look silly on a pair of chinos...
-
Originally posted by HeliosWhy so many people here using lame avatars, like beaurocrats, civil servants and politicians?
For everyone described above, I saw your avatars ounce running round in tights and got scarred for the rest of my life.
LOL. Who is the guy who looks like a Yankee Dale Winton? hehe
Leave a comment:
-
Thank link is sick man. No excuse even for an old timer, to be watching animals having fun with an ATW. Ban that **** you old perv lol.Originally posted by bogeymanHere's one for Dim.
Maybe it should the "The Wan king Prawn" tho.
Leave a comment:
-
I wonder how far you could push the 'porn for avatars' boundary before being banned?Originally posted by FleetwoodApparently not....
Leave a comment:
-
Apparently not....Originally posted by DimPrawnFFS is nothing sacred in this place?
Leave a comment:
-
Why is religion so sacred? (-- Jonathan Miller)Originally posted by DaveBNot if you believe what Chico has to say.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DimPrawnFFS is nothing sacred in this place?
Not if you belive what Chico has to say.
Leave a comment:
-
Normally, I would say that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, but why Helios would want to copy AtW is beyond me...
Leave a comment:
-
Helios, you thieving bastard, stop using my avatar immediately, get your own ffs!
Leave a comment:
-
Lame Avatars ????
Why so many people here using lame avatars, like beaurocrats, civil servants and politicians?
For everyone described above, I saw your avatars ounce running round in tights and got scarred for the rest of my life.
LOL. Who is the guy who looks like a Yankee Dale Winton? heheTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Leave a comment: