• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Have we done the one about the punter who got deported from Sri Lanka?"

Collapse

  • xoggoth
    replied
    Ditchwater isn't dull if you're a biologist - It's teaming with nice little creepy crawlies
    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
    You can't possibly judge what "the whole point of the post was" as you didn't post it, but you (and the others) haven't let that stop you from attributing sexist and misogynistic intent. You're welcome to your opinion, but it's no more than that.

    If "the word isn't that important" why change it?
    I don't think there was intent - just ignorance.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    But she is fugly. Not even MTT would.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by Bunk View Post
    The word isn't actually that important. You posted a link to a story about a woman being deported from Sri Lanka for having a tattoo, and the religious and legal implications of having tattoos in certain countries. Did you mention any of that? No, the whole point of the post was to point out that the woman was ugly. If it had been a man who was deported, would you have commented on his appearance and ignored the content of the story? I doubt it. That's why it's sexist, that's why it's misogynistic.
    You can't possibly judge what "the whole point of the post was" as you didn't post it, but you (and the others) haven't let that stop you from attributing sexist and misogynistic intent. You're welcome to your opinion, but it's no more than that.

    If "the word isn't that important" why change it?

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Yes, you do come across as dull as ditchwater.
    Ditchwater isn't dull if you're a biologist - It's teaming with horrid little creepy crawlies.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Cow is most definitely sexist. Being a Bull or a Stallion (instead of a mare) I should know.

    Ugly is non sexist. As is Munter!

    I assume if it had been a man we would of commented on his chav credentials and whether he looked like a peado, rapist or murderer (seems some things we are happy to discuss about men) . As such threads seem to normally go.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ticktock
    replied
    Originally posted by Bunk View Post
    The word isn't actually that important. You posted a link to a story about a woman being deported from Sri Lanka for having a tattoo, and the religious and legal implications of having tattoos in certain countries. Did you mention any of that? No, the whole point of the post was to point out that the woman was ugly. If it had been a man who was deported, would you have commented on his appearance and ignored the content of the story? I doubt it. That's why it's sexist, that's why it's misogynistic.
    Except that we regularly have stories linked to about men, where the comments are "What a chav" based on their appearance, without going into the details of the story. If this story were about a couple who were deported, and both looked like she does then the initial comment would probably have been "What a couple of munters".

    You can see misogyny wherever you want if you try hard enough.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bunk
    replied
    The word isn't actually that important. You posted a link to a story about a woman being deported from Sri Lanka for having a tattoo, and the religious and legal implications of having tattoos in certain countries. Did you mention any of that? No, the whole point of the post was to point out that the woman was ugly. If it had been a man who was deported, would you have commented on his appearance and ignored the content of the story? I doubt it. That's why it's sexist, that's why it's misogynistic.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ticktock
    replied
    Munter isn't a judgement of someone's worth based on shaggability.

    It's a judgement of someone's shaggability. If cow is OK, is ugly cow OK? Howabout just ugly?

    I would guess cow is OK as it doesn't refer to worth based on shaggability.
    Ugly is OK as it's a judgement on shaggability without necessarily referring to worth.
    Ugly cow is probably going to be called mysanthropic as it combines the two.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    The difference is that bitch/cow aren't judgements of someone's worth based on shaggability.
    So they're Ok? As long as it's a woman using them?

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
    I regularly hear women I know use these terms about other women - ironically I never do. I had foolishly regarded "munter" as a bit more of a lighthearted term.

    I got told though.
    The difference is that bitch/cow aren't judgements of someone's worth based on shaggability.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by BigTime View Post
    Bitch or cow perhaps
    I regularly hear women I know use these terms about other women - ironically I never do. I had foolishly regarded "munter" as a bit more of a lighthearted term.

    I got told though.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    When did you hear a woman refer to another woman as a munter?
    Never, but then again I only know about 5 British (including Irish) women and they're all pretty respectable but I have heard German women use their versions

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    When did you hear a woman refer to another woman as a munter?
    I have heard a number of women refer to men as Munters.

    On other women they tend to be more specific and point out the exact visual defect.

    Leave a comment:


  • BigTime
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    When did you hear a woman refer to another woman as a munter?
    Bitch or cow perhaps

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X