Ditchwater isn't dull if you're a biologist - It's teaming with nice little creepy crawlies
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Have we done the one about the punter who got deported from Sri Lanka?"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostYou can't possibly judge what "the whole point of the post was" as you didn't post it, but you (and the others) haven't let that stop you from attributing sexist and misogynistic intent. You're welcome to your opinion, but it's no more than that.
If "the word isn't that important" why change it?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bunk View PostThe word isn't actually that important. You posted a link to a story about a woman being deported from Sri Lanka for having a tattoo, and the religious and legal implications of having tattoos in certain countries. Did you mention any of that? No, the whole point of the post was to point out that the woman was ugly. If it had been a man who was deported, would you have commented on his appearance and ignored the content of the story? I doubt it. That's why it's sexist, that's why it's misogynistic.
If "the word isn't that important" why change it?
Leave a comment:
-
Cow is most definitely sexist. Being a Bull or a Stallion (instead of a mare) I should know.
Ugly is non sexist. As is Munter!
I assume if it had been a man we would of commented on his chav credentials and whether he looked like a peado, rapist or murderer (seems some things we are happy to discuss about men) . As such threads seem to normally go.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bunk View PostThe word isn't actually that important. You posted a link to a story about a woman being deported from Sri Lanka for having a tattoo, and the religious and legal implications of having tattoos in certain countries. Did you mention any of that? No, the whole point of the post was to point out that the woman was ugly. If it had been a man who was deported, would you have commented on his appearance and ignored the content of the story? I doubt it. That's why it's sexist, that's why it's misogynistic.
You can see misogyny wherever you want if you try hard enough.
Leave a comment:
-
The word isn't actually that important. You posted a link to a story about a woman being deported from Sri Lanka for having a tattoo, and the religious and legal implications of having tattoos in certain countries. Did you mention any of that? No, the whole point of the post was to point out that the woman was ugly. If it had been a man who was deported, would you have commented on his appearance and ignored the content of the story? I doubt it. That's why it's sexist, that's why it's misogynistic.
Leave a comment:
-
Munter isn't a judgement of someone's worth based on shaggability.
It's a judgement of someone's shaggability. If cow is OK, is ugly cow OK? Howabout just ugly?
I would guess cow is OK as it doesn't refer to worth based on shaggability.
Ugly is OK as it's a judgement on shaggability without necessarily referring to worth.
Ugly cow is probably going to be called mysanthropic as it combines the two.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mudskipper View PostThe difference is that bitch/cow aren't judgements of someone's worth based on shaggability.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostI regularly hear women I know use these terms about other women - ironically I never do. I had foolishly regarded "munter" as a bit more of a lighthearted term.
I got told though.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BigTime View PostBitch or cow perhaps
I got told though.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Five tax return mistakes contractors will make any day now… Jan 9 09:27
- Experts you can trust to deliver UK and global solutions tailored to your needs! Jan 8 15:10
- Business & Personal Protection for Contractors Jan 8 13:58
- ‘Four interest rate cuts in 2025’ not echoed by contractor advisers Jan 8 08:24
- ‘Why Should We Hire You?’ How to answer as an IT contractor Jan 7 09:30
- Even IT contractors connect with 'New Year, New Job.' But… Jan 6 09:28
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Jan 2 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
Leave a comment: