• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Test Galore - lets see how weird you are!"

Collapse

  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Ticktock View Post
    Oh good. So not being concerned over those fantasies means I'm not a nutter. Phew!
    you are probably still a nutter, but if you aren't unreasonably worried about things like this your diagnosis won't be OCD.

    I would imagine most significant people in history would be sectionable in some way.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Depression < low risk

    Autism : Above average score, but below the threshold

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    Same

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Apparently I could be dyspraxic, but then again I'm probably not

    I assume the "could be" bit comes from ticking the boxes that expressed my utter loathing of team sports, or any kind of organised physical activity. But I think that comes from hating the kind of person that delights in imposing such crap on others, rather than trying to cover up any physical inability to succeed. I've never made any secret of my physical inability to succeed at such activities, because I don't give a tinker's cuss for the opinions of those who value such success

    Leave a comment:


  • Ticktock
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    That's the OCD one, the key word is 'WORRY' as against show concern. A sufferer will spend hours actually trying to reassure themselves they didn't run someone over, even if their drive was completely uneventful and their car is undamaged (if they had hit someone then it would have visible damage). Its irrational fretting not due care & attention.

    quite terrifying to watch as well.
    Oh good. So not being concerned over those fantasies means I'm not a nutter. Phew!

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Ticktock View Post
    I've just been running through these and I'm a little confused. One question is:

    "Are you concerned about physically harming a loved one, pushing a stranger in front of a bus, steering your car into oncoming traffic; inappropriate sexual contact; or poisoning dinner guests?"

    Should you only answer in the affirmative if these things concern you? So if you consider doing these things but aren't concerned by those thoughts then you should say "no"?
    That's the OCD one, the key word is 'WORRY' as against show concern. A sufferer will spend hours actually trying to reassure themselves they didn't run someone over, even if their drive was completely uneventful and their car is undamaged (if they had hit someone then it would have visible damage). Its irrational fretting not due care & attention.

    quite terrifying to watch as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ticktock
    replied
    I've just been running through these and I'm a little confused. One question is:

    "Are you concerned about physically harming a loved one, pushing a stranger in front of a bus, steering your car into oncoming traffic; inappropriate sexual contact; or poisoning dinner guests?"

    Should you only answer in the affirmative if these things concern you? So if you consider doing these things but aren't concerned by those thoughts then you should say "no"?

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    We could have a nuthouse top trumps!
    and a book on the winner!

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    We could have a nuthouse top trumps!

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    started a topic Test Galore - lets see how weird you are!

    Test Galore - lets see how weird you are!

    Embarrassing Bodies - My MindChecker - Channel 4

    Autism > 32 -I'm Rainman.

Working...
X