• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: UKIP hype

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "UKIP hype"

Collapse

  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by Platypus View Post
    It's an issue in the next 13 months, that's when the General Election will be held.
    Which is why I said 12 months.

    In any case as the election starts to appear on people's radar I think many people will change their opinion. Those who are anti-all political parties will remain with UKIP, those who are really anti-labour will return to the Tories.

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    How is this blatantly obvious issue, an issue in the next 12 months?
    It's an issue in the next 13 months, that's when the General Election will be held.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by Pondlife View Post
    What I don't understand (ok, one of the many things), is why haven't UKIP managed to persuade some tory media whore existing MP to cross the floor.

    As I understand it others have left their party but remain as an independent MP. AFAIK it doesn't trigger a by-election

    Is there a parliamentary reason why it can't be done? Or would it just be political suicide?
    What would they achieve by swapping parties. Its not likely Nigel would allow himself to be replaced on TV opportunities....

    Leave a comment:


  • Pondlife
    replied
    What I don't understand (ok, one of the many things), is why haven't UKIP managed to persuade some tory media whore existing MP to cross the floor.

    As I understand it others have left their party but remain as an independent MP. AFAIK it doesn't trigger a by-election

    Is there a parliamentary reason why it can't be done? Or would it just be political suicide?

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Or Vince Cable. Imagine a coalition led by Vince Cable and Ken Clarke. What an awful thought!

    Or a coalition of Gordon Brown and Ted heath. I know he's been dead for decades but that would improve his performance.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by KentPhilip View Post
    Not true!
    WHS

    Vote UKIP! - Get Clegg!

    Leave a comment:


  • KentPhilip
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post

    Vote UKIP! - Get Milliband!
    Not true!

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    But vote Monster Raving Loony Party won't annoy mos and pg.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    The Lib Dem method they had in the referendum was very flawed but I'd like a system that delivered real PR. Policies that are supported by the majority and go with gut instincts are more likely to work than the crap from the self servers and educated idealists who can afford not to live with the problems that their policies inflict on ordinary people. Our current system, with all the undue influence that those in marginal seats have, is appalling.

    Also a written constitution that guaranteed certain things such as a secular principles for society and freedom of choice unless there was a soundly based reason to limit it for the common good and Swiss style referenda that could force parties to properly take account of public opinion on any issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Vote Monster Raving Loony Party!

    Leave a comment:


  • MicrosoftBob
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    Or how good it is.

    LibDems seem to have gone a bit quiet on the issue of PR.
    Are they worried the public might think it stands for Paedo Representation ?

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    When UKIP don't win a single seat it will prove how bad the current voting system is.
    Or how good it is.

    LibDems seem to have gone a bit quiet on the issue of PR.

    Leave a comment:


  • MicrosoftBob
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Did you know you can be against immigration and not be a racist?
    Vote UKIP!

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    When UKIP don't win a single seat it will prove how bad the current voting system is.

    And who cares who you vote for - Labour or Conservatives will win and their policies are identical.

    A great pity it has taken a twunt like Farage to bring Immigration onto the agenda. The only growth industries in this country are driven by credit(especially house prices) and immigration. And immigration has only benefited the rich - the vast majority of people are worse off.

    Did you know you can be against immigration and not be a racist?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    I do read the Economist in the bath though - Seems to take forever sometimes
    Too many words and not enough pictures?



    Leave a comment:

Working...
X