• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Breach of confidentiality"

Collapse

  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by MaryPoppins View Post
    Me too, and he didn't get a letter about it beforehand. I have little sympathy.
    And on the topic of client confidentiality, should you have spilled the beans on that punter who rested his newspaper on your head while you were noshing him on the tube?

    And you still owe me two quid commission.

    Leave a comment:


  • MaryPoppins
    replied
    Originally posted by centurian View Post
    Within the past 3 months, I have seen a contractor escorted off premises for e-mailing a document to his personal address. The document was tagged "confidential" - even though the contents were hardly ground-breaking. But because it was tagged confidential, it was deemed an on the spot firing offence.

    Source code would be regarded as confidential - although it was probably copied and pasted from Stack Overflow.
    Me too, and he didn't get a letter about it beforehand. I have little sympathy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by Unix View Post
    I always find this locking down ridiculous, there is always a way around it and all you end up doing is hindering the developer. Given the developer wrote the code he could just rewrite it all from memory at home, whats next memory wipes on your brain?
    Camera phone to video the screen while you scroll down should work.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pondlife
    replied
    Originally posted by Unix View Post
    I always find this locking down ridiculous, there is always a way around it and all you end up doing is hindering the developer. Given the developer wrote the code he could just rewrite it all from memory at home, whats next memory wipes on your brain?
    You're assuming the code he 'stole', is code he'd written. May well not be the case.

    Leave a comment:


  • Unix
    replied
    I always find this locking down ridiculous, there is always a way around it and all you end up doing is hindering the developer. Given the developer wrote the code he could just rewrite it all from memory at home, whats next memory wipes on your brain?

    Leave a comment:


  • SpontaneousOrder
    replied
    Originally posted by Bunk View Post
    If they're that worried about security, web mail will be blocked or monitored anyway.
    I tether my phone, although unless it's just for a quick check on some blocked website, I tend to use my own laptop rather than the provided one for that kind of stuff.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    The NHS is reassuringly slack for non-patient data. And as a result I do work on the train on my own laptop, so they win.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bunk
    replied
    Originally posted by KentPhilip View Post
    Which email account was used?
    If I ever have to email anything home I generally use webmail so that nothing is logged on corporate systems.
    If they're that worried about security, web mail will be blocked or monitored anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • KentPhilip
    replied
    Which email account was used?
    If I ever have to email anything home I generally use webmail so that nothing is logged on corporate systems.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    A "friend"?
    I hope so. If it was his last contract they will go for the goolies..

    Leave a comment:


  • MyUserName
    replied
    Why did he do it? Or, why can he claimed he did it?
    If he had solved a neat but generic issue and wanted to save it he *might* be okay with a warning.

    What would have been the long term effects of him having this code?
    What does his contract say about IP?

    No two ways about this - you(r friend) has made a mistake here and it is damage limitation time.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    A "friend"?

    Leave a comment:


  • Scrag Meister
    replied
    At current clientco, sending any email to your own personal email address is an offence worthy of contract termination.

    I have a dispensation so I can send a PDF of my timesheet to my business account each week.

    Other than that I don't want to test it to find out how strict the policy is.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Well he can expect to be interviewed, so if it he posted a bit of code simply to work on at home, probably get a slap on the wrist. It's a bad idea to do anything like this. There was a developer at one bank who pinched code and was offering it to other banks.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    I've seen it a Pharma company and one of the big drinks companies.

    Was the code he emailed this bit?
    Code:
       public static void main(String args[]) {
    
          for(int x = 10; x < 20; x = x+1) {
             System.out.print("value of x : " + x );
             System.out.print("\n");
          }
       }
    Yes - but they were using vba so it didn't run.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X