• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "More 'End of the World' news..."

Collapse

  • DaveB
    replied
    It's just a re-run of the ACS Law case over here a couple of years ago.

    ACS:Law - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Leave a comment:


  • Ticktock
    replied
    What if they find they've falsely accused someone? Will they take the list of accused users and rub one out?

    Leave a comment:


  • greenlake
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    How many members of the esteemed panel will feel obliged to give up their evenings entertainment?
    There are still the old-fashioned methods....

    Leave a comment:


  • Ticktock
    replied
    Agreed. Trying to spank the monkeys who watched something on this site seems strange.

    Apparently there have already been a lot of complaints from people who received the demands but are claiming innocence.

    Leave a comment:


  • DirtyDog
    replied
    Surely the target should the hosting company, not those that use the services? It's the equivalent of charging the viewer because they watch something on YouTube which shouldn't be there because it breaches someone's copyright.

    Proving the user was the person who they have billed is going to be difficult - they are relying on sending a letter to lots of people who are too embarrassed to want to fight it. It's no better than having malicious pop-ups which demand a fee to unlock your computer - at least in that scenario you've actually done something wrong in the first place.

    If this is the way the industry is going, it's going to lead to more people torrenting filth through an anonymous proxy / VPN, rather than streaming from RedTube. At least if the copyright holders went after RedTube etc, they might be able to thrash out a deal (fnarr fnarr) and make some money from it, rather than risking getting nothing and killing the golden goose (or choking the golden chicken or something similar).

    Ridiculous idea.

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    started a topic More 'End of the World' news...

    More 'End of the World' news...

    BBC News - Porn users targeted by German law firm over copyright

    How many members of the esteemed panel will feel obliged to give up their evenings entertainment?

Working...
X