Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
If they remove all the cargo - and drain out most of the fuel - leaving just enough to get to a bigger airport - and tow/push it to the very edge of the runway apron, they could probably do a take-off on a 1,860m runway.
No doubt that's what Boeing are number crunching right now. If not, they're f*****
If they remove all the cargo - and drain out most of the fuel - leaving just enough to get to a bigger airport - and tow/push it to the very edge of the runway apron, they could probably do a take-off on a 1,860m runway.
No doubt that's what Boeing are number crunching right now. If not, they're f*****
The cargo plane normally requires a runway of 2,780m (9,119ft) to take off at maximum weight
If they remove all the cargo - and drain out most of the fuel - leaving just enough to get to a bigger airport - and tow/push it to the very edge of the runway apron, they could probably do a take-off on a 1,860m runway.
No doubt that's what Boeing are number crunching right now. If not, they're f*****
Last edited by centurian; 21 November 2013, 13:41.
Leave a comment: