• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Politician slags off IT professionals"

Collapse

  • LisaContractorUmbrella
    replied
    It would seem that politicians can be outwitted by creatures with far lower IQ's than the average IT contractor - these comments obviously stemmed from jealousy BBC News - Badgers 'moved goalposts' says minister Owen Paterson

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Agree AIUI Snowden saw himself as a whistle blower.

    Were he a nurse in a care home or hospital watching neglect and waste that is endemic he would be hailed as a hero for bringing it to the public's attention.

    This is more about discrediting the messenger.

    If you found a nurse who was so empathic it ruined their personal life they would be praised as heroic, an IT worker who is too focussed to integrate and do football etc jokes is seen as weird.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    The trouble with responding to this in a defensive fashion is that it can help to prove his point. I've been thinking about how to respond, and while I think his statement about code being 'either absolutely right, or absolutely wrong' is missing many nuances such as user expectation, suitability for purpose and the question of whether the user's wishes are really such a great idea, ethical questions and so on, I don't think it would really help to simply cut apart his story and replace it with my own rhetoric.

    So I'm looking at this from another angle; I get the impression he's picked up on the Snowden story and projected it onto IT people in general. IT people, geeks or not, are members of the same societies as binmen, grocers, agents and politicians, and within those societies there is considerable anger, sometimes justified, at politics and those who practise politics. Recently we've seen wars based on lies, or 'sexed up' stories, taxes rising while government builds up debt, people feeling they recieve less and less in return for their contribution, and the growth of a huge state bureaucracy that many people feel is unnecessarily intruding in their lives. The frustration is widespread, and includes IT people. The difference is in how some IT people fight back. Most are probably as easy going and uncombattive as the next person, but some have the skills to 'take the fight back' to politicians or authority figures that they percieve, again rightly or wrongly, to be the enemy of the people. Snowden is an example. Other people might join a protest march, phone a radio show to rant or simply thump their fists on the bar while boring everyone else in the pub. The binmen can't do much more than 'forget' to empty a politician's bin, although they're now so continually controlled and observed by their managers that they probably can't even do that without being spotted.

    Add to all this that people of all levels of intelligence or education sometimes try to frame what they see into an internally consistent, but nonsensical view of the world (a conspiracy theory), to try an make sense of what they see.

    I think Mr Walshe should take a closer look at the attitudes that are vented by 'geeks' and then find out if those attitudes and anger are actually part of a wider set of attitudes, involving a cross section of society, instead of giving simplistic descriptions of IT people as thinking in binary and being unable to understand nuances.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Control.

    Now go and make me a cuppa of builder's tea, no sugar and a splash of milk.
    Fck off and make your own tea.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    or Fix washing machines
    Those technicians don't tend to trust the UK government either it's a British affliction....

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Engineer, the holly grail. The highest accolade that could be awarded to someone servicing the IT industry.
    or Fix washing machines

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    You only have to read CUK for half a day to see he has a point.
    Or this thread.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    I know Engineers who can do both, but not Politicians.
    Engineer, the holly grail. The highest accolade that could be awarded to someone servicing the IT industry.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Nail on the head, hit.
    Most IT types are hugely limited outside their narrow domains.
    Many management types are severely limited outside their buzzwords.

    True Polymaths are very rare, many great managers just sail on top of other people's expertise. Their skill is selecting the right people and trusting them plus their gut. Few wish or can understand the little stuff.

    The people who try and fail to emulate them then denigrate the staff that understand the small stuff because they don't 'fit' into their narrow view of the world.


    The real question is who would you trust to fix your life support and who would you trust to raise the money for a new one.

    I know Engineers who can do both, but not Politicians.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    You only have to read CUK for half a day to see he has a point.

    Leave a comment:


  • NigelJK
    replied
    Most IT types are hugely limited outside their narrow domains.
    Most professionals are as that is what being a professional is all about. Try mentioning Accountants without remembering Monty Pythons assassination of them.

    Now lets do a short pithy summation of your average Polico (who don't forget is NOT a professional and can get the 'job' without any certified qualifications or experience).

    Their basic assumption is that if you can't win, cheat.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by Pondlife View Post


    What sort of low-fat limp wristed builders are you using.
    Lost my sweet tooth many moons ago, not to mention many lbs.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by CoolCat View Post
    "many software engineers find the nuances and ambiguity of political practice hard to understand".
    Nail on the head, hit.
    Most IT types are hugely limited outside their narrow domains.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pondlife
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Control.

    Now go and make me a cuppa of builder's tea, no sugar and a splash of milk.


    What sort of low-fat limp wristed builders are you using.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    What's the "real" agenda?
    Control.

    Now go and make me a cuppa of builder's tea, no sugar and a splash of milk.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X