Reply to: Introducing a new CUK acronym:

[vetran]

I vote for a new title for SAS too.

How about : CretinMaster General?

[eek]

JAW

You can't call Sas a that will scare many people from ing in case they turn into Sas.

Blooming heck you've actually given the bible bashers a scare story that will stop boys ing

[OwlHoot]

JAW

JAC off

[MarillionFan]

I've decided with the current infestation of cretinous imbeciles on CUK that it's not worth wasting my time arguing with all of you (those who are cretins, that is).

Therefore if I label a post of yours with this acronym: JAC (Just Another Cretin), this is a handy shortcut for the following:

"Your post is ignorant, childish, puerile, lacking in any knowledge of the subject matter, clichéd, downright stupid, vapid, venal or any combinations thereof"

HTH

JAW

[bless 'em all]

JACP! Next!

It'll just be another 'boy who cried wolf!' situation. We'll become immune, if we're not already, to this.

[sasguru]

SAS - King of the cretins

JACP! Next!

[sasguru]

. Perhaps even sentence level 'jacing' is necessary.

Desirable, perhaps, but impractical.

[amcdonald]

I think you're right, we need three levels. So here's the latest iteration:

JACP - Just another cretinous post
JACT - Just another cretinous thread
JACI - Just another cretinous individual (for indivuals, most of whose posts/threads are JACPs/JACTs).

SAS - King of the cretins

[Mich the Tester]

Do you mean label a post, or a thread? Thread-level-jacing might not be granular enough.

I concur, considering the ability of some posters to contradict themselves in one thread and accidentally say something sensible in one post. Perhaps even sentence level 'jacing' is necessary.

[sasguru]

Do you mean label a post, or a thread? Thread-level-jacing might not be granular enough.

I think you're right, we need three levels. So here's the latest iteration:

JACP - Just another cretinous post
JACT - Just another cretinous thread
JACI - Just another cretinous individual (for indivuals, most of whose posts/threads are JACPs/JACTs).

[d000hg]

Do you mean label a post, or a thread? Thread-level-jacing might not be granular enough.

[sasguru]

Also I'd like to introduce a complementary acronym : JACT - Just Another Cretinous Thread.
This is a thread where most of the posts/posters are JACs.

[doodab]

Sasguru might sometimes be a little impolite but I agree on the need for a 'cretinwatch' service on CUK.

Who needs a cretin watch when it's always cretin o'clock?

[Mich the Tester]

Sasguru might sometimes be a little impolite but I agree on the need for a 'cretinwatch' service on CUK.

[sasguru]

It may be easier just to label threads without cretinism as njac, and take jac as read for the rest. That's what I do.

True dat.