Originally posted by amcdonald
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Is this enough to make you vote for Labour?"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by TykeMerc View PostThis whole speech is a typical soundbite laden pile of un-costed, impractical horsesh1t aimed at conning a few extra votes with no realistic prospect delivery.Last edited by amcdonald; 25 September 2013, 08:15.
Leave a comment:
-
From the BBC (so pinch of salt).
Quoted from Milibrain :-
"The Labour leader argued firms had been "overcharging" customers for many years and millions of households would benefit from the temporary cap on prices at a time when finances were under acute pressure and many were struggling to heat their homes."
If they were overcharging for years why didn't the incumbent Labour administration pull them up on that?
This whole speech is a typical soundbite laden pile of un-costed, impractical horsesh1t aimed at conning a few extra votes with no realistic prospect delivery.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostAnd yet also a problem with empty houses!
http://www.emptyhomes.com/wp-content...-stats2012.jpg
Homes From Empty Homes » Empty Homes Statistics 2011/12
259,000 are long- term empty (meaning they have been empty for more than six months). So 10% of what they need now. Only 30,000 in the south east.
You will probably find most of these are being allowed to fall down to force planning or aren't in a fit state or place to rent.
Leave a comment:
-
Vote Labour? The very thought of it is enough to make a chap vomit.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View Post200k houses every year? That's getting on for a million people housed every year. Do we have even 1 million homeless people, much less several million?
Or are the extra houses for the extra immigrants they'll allow to flood in?
and another 2 million eligible to come here from Romania etc.
we need 200K every year for the next 20 years to cope with that.
Good job Mandelson sent out a search party!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View Post200k houses every year? That's getting on for a million people housed every year. Do we have even 1 million homeless people, much less several million?
Or are the extra houses for the extra immigrants they'll allow to flood in?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Spartan View PostThe thing I fail to understand about all these houses they promise to build is how will they make any money? Obviously you have the initial outlay to build the houses and then once the tenants are in they'll be paying rent far below the average for a private rent, plus the fact that the majority of tenants will be on HB which is paid by the government anyway. Have I missed something?
Leave a comment:
-
200k houses every year? That's getting on for a million people housed every year. Do we have even 1 million homeless people, much less several million?
Or are the extra houses for the extra immigrants they'll allow to flood in?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Spartan View PostIsn't it well publicised that current market rents are too high and this is one of the solutions to bring down rents rather then introducing a rent cap
not sure about the long term sustainability of such a policy.
Leave a comment:
-
Isn't it well publicised that current market rents are too high and this is one of the solutions to bring down rents rather then introducing a rent cap
Leave a comment:
-
about 30% will be social AIUI if they want to get planning permission.
http://www.hastings.gov.uk/environme...ousing_advice/
but:
18 per cent of all households in England live in social housing.
Who gets social housing? - Shelter England
some interesting stats there.
https://www.gov.uk/government/public...d-2010-to-2011
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Today 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
Leave a comment: