Originally posted by d000hg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Really CWJobs?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Really CWJobs?"
Collapse
-
Scheme provider - they should have a UK license with a UK HQ to provide such services to UK tax residents (who can be located elsewhere). Money earned by the UK office should pay all UK taxes.
-
For the scheme provider or the customers? If they're not in the UK then they won't be going to jail in the UK...Originally posted by AtW View PostSimple way to stop this tulip:
1) Any scheme provider doing it for UK tax residents MUST be licensed and located in UK - otherwise it's jail time.
Leave a comment:
-
Simple way to stop this tulip:
1) Any scheme provider doing it for UK tax residents MUST be licensed and located in UK - otherwise it's jail time.
2) Scheme promoters (people not Ltd they hide behind) should be made jointly and severally liable for any tax/penalties that become due later when "scheme" turns out to be "not working".
3) They should also have acceptable insurance cover in the event they go bankrupt - failing to maintain that should lead to a very long jail sentence.
4) Usage of any such scheme should have increased penalties - more "hops" money make from one artificial entity to another the higher the penalties.
And if they don't like it then they can relocate their business to rob taxpayers of some other country
Last edited by AtW; 28 August 2013, 11:52.
Leave a comment:
-
It's even more profitable if nobody uses the schemes. And it's even less work if they can stop people using them. Hence banning the advertising of such schemes.Originally posted by eek View PostIt is more profitable, less work for HMRC (and they don't have the staff) to attack scheme users at the end rather than at the beginning.
Leave a comment:
-
HMRC's own site states...Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Posthow do you know it is dodgy?
HM Revenue & Customs: Tackling tax avoidance: SpotlightsTax planning to be wary of
It sounds too good to be true.
Artificial or contrived arrangements are involved.
It seems very complex given what you want to do.
There are guaranteed returns with apparently no risk.
There are secrecy or confidentiality agreements.
Upfront fees are payable or the arrangement is on a no win/no fee basis.
The scheme is said to be vetted by a top lawyer or accountant but no details of their opinion are provided.
The scheme is said to be approved by HMRC (it does not follow that this is true).
Taxation of income is delayed or tax deductions accelerated.
Leave a comment:
-
It is more profitable, less work for HMRC (and they don't have the staff) to attack scheme users at the end rather than at the beginning.Originally posted by d000hg View PostAnd what does that matter? You're not responsible for your father's actions. Cameron has made it clear he doesn't like such schemes regardless.
If you think HMRC are going to attack schemes early on you are just not cynical enough.
Leave a comment:
-
Didn't Cameron's father make his money in off-shore schemes..Originally posted by d000hg View PostIn seriousness, I am somewhat surprised Cameron hasn't cracked down on people advertising these schemes - wonder if they'll ban advertising even if they don't/can't ban the schemes themselves?
Smoking is legal but advertising cigarettes isn't, before someone points out that avoidance is legal.
Leave a comment:
-
In seriousness, I am somewhat surprised Cameron hasn't cracked down on people advertising these schemes - wonder if they'll ban advertising even if they don't/can't ban the schemes themselves?
Smoking is legal but advertising cigarettes isn't, before someone points out that avoidance is legal.
Leave a comment:
-
how do you know it is dodgy?Originally posted by d000hg View PostSeriously, HMRC and the government are making tax evasion headline news and one of the big job-boards is advertising some dodgy scheme?
Leave a comment:
-
Selling the advertising space is just business.. CUK does much the same i think, pretty sure i have seen adverts or banners for similar companies here.Originally posted by d000hg View PostSeriously, HMRC and the government are making tax evasion headline news and one of the big job-boards is advertising some dodgy scheme?
Leave a comment:
-
Really CWJobs?
Seriously, HMRC and the government are making tax evasion headline news and one of the big job-boards is advertising some dodgy scheme?Originally posted by cwjobs.co.uk newsletterUp to 88% earnings retention, £500 Joining Bonus, Compliant with HMRC
Interested in getting the most out of running your own limited company...
AND receiving a £500 bonus for signing up?
As a contractor looking for good returns it is most likely that you are using or planning to use a Limited Company.
If that is the case we have a simple proposition for you. We can significantly increase the money you can access through a Limited Company by combining it with expert tax planning. Not only can we increase your financial efficiencies, we will also improve the day to day management of your Limited Company by providing you with an accounting service solely focused on contractors requirements.Last edited by d000hg; 28 August 2013, 10:27.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Yesterday 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Leave a comment: