• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Really CWJobs?

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Really CWJobs?"

Collapse

  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    For the scheme provider or the customers? If they're not in the UK then they won't be going to jail in the UK...
    Scheme provider - they should have a UK license with a UK HQ to provide such services to UK tax residents (who can be located elsewhere). Money earned by the UK office should pay all UK taxes.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Simple way to stop this tulip:

    1) Any scheme provider doing it for UK tax residents MUST be licensed and located in UK - otherwise it's jail time.
    For the scheme provider or the customers? If they're not in the UK then they won't be going to jail in the UK...

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Simple way to stop this tulip:

    1) Any scheme provider doing it for UK tax residents MUST be licensed and located in UK - otherwise it's jail time.

    2) Scheme promoters (people not Ltd they hide behind) should be made jointly and severally liable for any tax/penalties that become due later when "scheme" turns out to be "not working".

    3) They should also have acceptable insurance cover in the event they go bankrupt - failing to maintain that should lead to a very long jail sentence.

    4) Usage of any such scheme should have increased penalties - more "hops" money make from one artificial entity to another the higher the penalties.

    And if they don't like it then they can relocate their business to rob taxpayers of some other country
    Last edited by AtW; 28 August 2013, 11:52.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    It is more profitable, less work for HMRC (and they don't have the staff) to attack scheme users at the end rather than at the beginning.
    It's even more profitable if nobody uses the schemes. And it's even less work if they can stop people using them. Hence banning the advertising of such schemes.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    how do you know it is dodgy?
    HMRC's own site states...

    Tax planning to be wary of
    It sounds too good to be true.
    Artificial or contrived arrangements are involved.
    It seems very complex given what you want to do.
    There are guaranteed returns with apparently no risk.
    There are secrecy or confidentiality agreements.
    Upfront fees are payable or the arrangement is on a no win/no fee basis.
    The scheme is said to be vetted by a top lawyer or accountant but no details of their opinion are provided.
    The scheme is said to be approved by HMRC (it does not follow that this is true).
    Taxation of income is delayed or tax deductions accelerated.
    HM Revenue & Customs: Tackling tax avoidance: Spotlights

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    And what does that matter? You're not responsible for your father's actions. Cameron has made it clear he doesn't like such schemes regardless.
    It is more profitable, less work for HMRC (and they don't have the staff) to attack scheme users at the end rather than at the beginning.

    If you think HMRC are going to attack schemes early on you are just not cynical enough.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by moggy View Post
    Didn't Cameron's father make his money in off-shore schemes..
    And what does that matter? You're not responsible for your father's actions. Cameron has made it clear he doesn't like such schemes regardless.

    Leave a comment:


  • moggy
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    In seriousness, I am somewhat surprised Cameron hasn't cracked down on people advertising these schemes - wonder if they'll ban advertising even if they don't/can't ban the schemes themselves?

    Smoking is legal but advertising cigarettes isn't, before someone points out that avoidance is legal.
    Didn't Cameron's father make his money in off-shore schemes..

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    In seriousness, I am somewhat surprised Cameron hasn't cracked down on people advertising these schemes - wonder if they'll ban advertising even if they don't/can't ban the schemes themselves?

    Smoking is legal but advertising cigarettes isn't, before someone points out that avoidance is legal.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    The clue for me is that they say "Compliant with HMRC".
    FTFY as these scams are never approved by HMRC merely compliant with HMRC creating a new one for you a few years down the line.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    The clue for me is that they say "approved by HMRC".

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Seriously, HMRC and the government are making tax evasion headline news and one of the big job-boards is advertising some dodgy scheme?
    how do you know it is dodgy?

    Leave a comment:


  • moggy
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Seriously, HMRC and the government are making tax evasion headline news and one of the big job-boards is advertising some dodgy scheme?
    Selling the advertising space is just business.. CUK does much the same i think, pretty sure i have seen adverts or banners for similar companies here.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    started a topic Really CWJobs?

    Really CWJobs?

    Originally posted by cwjobs.co.uk newsletter
    Up to 88% earnings retention, £500 Joining Bonus, Compliant with HMRC

    Interested in getting the most out of running your own limited company...

    AND receiving a £500 bonus for signing up?

    As a contractor looking for good returns it is most likely that you are using or planning to use a Limited Company.

    If that is the case we have a simple proposition for you. We can significantly increase the money you can access through a Limited Company by combining it with expert tax planning. Not only can we increase your financial efficiencies, we will also improve the day to day management of your Limited Company by providing you with an accounting service solely focused on contractors requirements.
    Seriously, HMRC and the government are making tax evasion headline news and one of the big job-boards is advertising some dodgy scheme?
    Last edited by d000hg; 28 August 2013, 10:27.

Working...
X