• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Want to earn some pin money?"

Collapse

  • Paddy
    replied
    [QUOTE=Board Game Geek]

    Furthermore M'lud, the Defendant wishes to claim damages for intrusion of privacy from the aforementioned voyeurs, one of whom, on such an occassion, took a personal photograph of the Defendant, rampant erectus, QUOTE]


    Strange but true, the legal definition of rampant erectus is if it is greater than the angle of the Mull of Kintyre.

    Leave a comment:


  • Board Game Geek
    replied
    It's only a matter of time before someone so accused, with the aid of a very persuasive barrister, argues that "The Defendant was merely exercising his personal right to self-gratification. That the fact that there were onlookers, nay, voyeurs, in the immediate proximity, should have no bearing on the Defendant's human right to pleasure himself accordingly.

    Furthermore M'lud, the Defendant wishes to claim damages for intrusion of privacy from the aforementioned voyeurs, one of whom, on such an occassion, took a personal photograph of the Defendant, rampant erectus, without the Defendant's consent, and proceeded to make the picture freely available to all and sundry on the medium known as the Internet.

    Quite clearly, my Defendant, after the ridicule and embarrassment of having his private parts ridiculed by the public, has suffered from considerable low self-esteem, and has been unable to maintain his, ahem, rigidity for such purpose of self-gratification since the affair.

    M'Lud : "Ah, yes, a terrible thing indeed. I hereby acquit the accused of any wrong-doing, apart from "littering" in a public place, which carries a maximum sentence of 160 hours of masturbation in the public community."

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Well it looks like me, but I'm not saying anything more without my brief.

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn
    I gave it try once but public transport let me down for my appointment.

    The first time I came on the bus, the second time I missed the tube.

    Is this you DP?

    Leave a comment:


  • Clog II The Avenger
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn
    I gave it try once but public transport let me down for my appointment.

    The first time I came on the bus, the second time I missed the tube.
    I know some people who would find that hard to swallow.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Lone Gunman
    replied
    Boom Boom

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    I gave it try once but public transport let me down for my appointment.

    The first time I came on the bus, the second time I missed the tube.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jabberwocky
    replied
    I insist that my seed only go to genetically perfect women. Otherwise the Jabber master race may become diluted and impure. Of course if you just have common or garden spunk feel free to spray it around with gay abandon.

    Leave a comment:


  • ChimpMaster
    replied
    Originally posted by Clog II The Avenger
    I heard that in Sweden the nurses extract it from the donors.

    Yeah but you pay them rather than they pay you. Still worth it though.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Lone Gunman
    replied
    Originally posted by Clog II The Avenger
    I heard that in Sweden the nurses extract it from the donors.
    I knew a few nurses in the UK who were more than willing!

    Leave a comment:


  • Clog II The Avenger
    replied
    I heard that in Sweden the nurses extract it from the donors.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hart-floot
    replied
    Originally posted by Pondlife
    This is already in LR I believe.

    http://forums.contractoruk.com/thread9188.html
    Thats me. Always behind the times. Now where did i put that quill pen.............

    Leave a comment:


  • Pondlife
    replied
    This is already in LR I believe.

    http://forums.contractoruk.com/thread9188.html

    Leave a comment:


  • Hart-floot
    started a topic Want to earn some pin money?

    Want to earn some pin money?

    Should be enough w**k**s on here to help out

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/5230890.stm

    Worry over sperm donor shortage

    The UK is suffering from a shortage of sperm donors
    Fertility clinics are facing a "national crisis" because of a shortage of sperm donors, say experts.
    Infertility Network UK said a change in the law, which abolished anonymity for donors, has stopped men volunteering.

    But other campaigners said a lack of awareness of the need for sperm donors was the reason for the fall in numbers, not the law change.

    The number of sperm donors has been steadily declining over the past number of years, HFEA figures show.

    In 2000, 325 sperm donors were newly registered with the HFEA but in the first six months of 2005, only 99 men were registered.

    Around 500 sperm donors and 1,500 egg donors are needed each year.

    Since the 1st April 2005, people donating sperm and eggs have not had the right to remain anonymous.

    But the HFEA said there had been no sudden drop in donors coming forward after the law came in.

    "The clinics are struggling and that's putting it mildly. It's difficult to say 100% that the removal of anonymity is or isn't the reason but this is what everybody was concerned would happen.

Working...
X