• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Economist on the politics of UK young people"

Collapse

  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by Pondlife View Post
    The issue is that no one wants to annoy, and therefore lose, the grey vote since it's very powerful.
    And no one gives a tulip about annoying students, which is ironic because it's only by educating people to a high standard we're going to build the strong economy we need to pay all the other bills.

    Personally I don't want a state pension, I'd much rather my son got a decent education without being knee deep in debt at the end of it.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    He is even more hamstrung by the rapidly aging population which eats up the greatest proportion of benefits and the NHS.

    The problem for this blame-culture era is that it's no-one's fault. The country needs prosperity and more people putting into the coffers to make up the shortfall.

    That's the problem for the Government (of any persuasion) and it's a head-spinning vote-loser whichever way you look at it.
    Logans run had the answer:

    t's 2274 and on the surface, it all seems to be an idyllic society. Living in a city within an enclosed dome, there is little or no work for humans to perform and inhabitants are free to pursue all of the pleasures of life. There is one catch however: your life is limited and when you reach 30, it is terminated in a quasi-religious ceremony known as Carousel. Some, known as runners, do try to escape their fate when the time comes and it's the job of Sandmen to track them down and kill them. Logan is such a man and with several years before his own termination date, thinks nothing of the job he does. Soon after meeting a young woman, Jessica-6, he is ordered to become a runner himself and infiltrate a community outside the dome known as Sanctuary and to destroy it. Pursued by his friend Francis, also a Sandman, Logan and Jessica find their way to the outside. There they discover a beautiful, virtually uninhabited world. Logan realizes that he must return to the dome to tell them what ...

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    Its not just the Grey vote that worries them IMHO.


    Gay

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    Its not just the Grey vote that worries them IMHO.
    It's the Green as well!

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    whs
    Its not just the Grey vote that worries them IMHO.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by Pondlife View Post
    The issue is that no one wants to annoy, and therefore lose, the grey vote since it's very powerful.
    whs

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Pondlife View Post
    The issue is that no one wants to annoy, and therefore lose, the grey vote since it's very powerful.
    or the Benefit clients

    or the home owners

    or the big businesses (they supply directorships).

    so basically they need to grow a pair and get on with it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pondlife
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    the ageing population is healthier longer than ever before, they can work and put in for longer.

    The work is far less physical than before so 70 year olds can still provide useful work.

    Decision & experience based work is more common so older workers are more useful. e.g. B&Q grey workforce.

    Automation has removed the need for many manual / repetitive jobs so many jobs in the civil service could be culled.

    The challenge is making everyone work
    The issue is that no one wants to annoy, and therefore lose, the grey vote since it's very powerful.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    the ageing population is healthier longer than ever before, they can work and put in for longer.

    The work is far less physical than before so 70 year olds can still provide useful work.

    Decision & experience based work is more common so older workers are more useful. e.g. B&Q grey workforce.

    Automation has removed the need for many manual / repetitive jobs so many jobs in the civil service could be culled.

    The challenge is making everyone work

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    He is even more hamstrung by the rapidly aging population which eats up the greatest proportion of benefits and the NHS.

    The problem for this blame-culture era is that it's no-one's fault. The country needs prosperity and more people putting into the coffers to make up the shortfall.

    That's the problem for the Government (of any persuasion) and it's a head-spinning vote-loser whichever way you look at it.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    I wonder how much he's hamstrung by the Libdems.
    he is hamstrung by history, he needs to trim costs (benefits, public sector workers, historic debts) not sure the Lib dems are the problem.

    none of that is going to be popular. The few changes he has made on Benefits have been painted as cruel cuts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    I think he is, I also admire him for sticking to his guns and not listening Ed "Borrow more" Balls
    I wonder how much he's hamstrung by the Libdems.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    If only the government spent within those 'limited funds' instead of building up more and more debt. I suppose Mr Osborne's doing his best.

    I think he is, I also admire him for sticking to his guns and not listening Ed "Borrow more" Balls

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    The government has limited funds. The debate is not about "saddling them with debt" but about how further education should befunded.
    If only the government spent within those 'limited funds' instead of building up more and more debt. I suppose Mr Osborne's doing his best.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Interesting and a sign of hope, but hardly surprising given the debts with which young people have been saddled by past governments;




    British politics and the young: The strange rebirth of liberal England | The Economist

    The government has limited funds. The debate is not about "saddling them with debt" but about how further education should befunded.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X