Originally posted by northernladuk
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: New/old continent?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "New/old continent?"
Collapse
-
Let's just hope they don't also discover a couple of hundred thousand IT grads looking for work..
Leave a comment:
-
Yes, Im aware there have been other 'super continents.' My point was that scientists seem to contend that these super continents all contain the current continents and not, some unknown landmasses that have now been subducted.
Leave a comment:
-
A supercontinent, the sole big landmass on the planet, has formed every several hundred million years or so, during continental drift, and several have now been inferred and named, including likely future ones.Originally posted by BolshieBastard View PostGiven the planet has tectonic plate activity, I find it odd that scientists insist pangea was the only landmass before it split apart.
Leave a comment:
-
In the Indian Ocean? That would be a quirk of fate.Originally posted by SimonMac View PostAtlantis?
Leave a comment:
-
The forming of supercontinents and their breaking up appears to have been cyclical through Earth's history. There may have been several others before Pangaea. The fourth-last supercontinent, called Columbia or Nuna, appears to have assembled in the period 2.0–1.8 Ga.[5][6] Columbia/Nuna broke up and the next supercontinent, Rodinia, formed from the accretion and assembly of its fragments. Rodinia lasted from about 1.1 billion years ago (Ga) until about 750 million years ago, but its exact configuration and geodynamic history are not nearly as well understood as those of the later supercontinents, Pannotia and Pangaea.
Seems the wiki authors are happy with more than one supercontinent. I keep reading that as Rodney.
Leave a comment:
-
Given the planet has tectonic plate activity, I find it odd that scientists insist pangea was the only landmass before it split apart.Originally posted by d000hg View PostBBC News - Fragments of ancient continent buried under Indian Ocean
All interesting but I was struck by this phraseThat's a little open-ended... are they trying to keep the creationists happy?
Leave a comment:
-
New/old continent?
BBC News - Fragments of ancient continent buried under Indian Ocean
All interesting but I was struck by this phraseThat's a little open-ended... are they trying to keep the creationists happy?Researchers have found evidence for a landmass that would have existed between 2,000 and 85 million years ago.
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Is HMRC ‘cruelly seeking to transfer debts’ to MSC contractors? Today 06:37
- IT contractor demand climbed in August 2026 to 40-month high Sep 25 04:53
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Sep 24 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Sep 23 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Sep 22 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37

Leave a comment: