• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Appeasing public opinion"

Collapse

  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    The fact that an MP's salary is more than your entire profit?

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    What am I jealous about in your view...
    The fact that an MP's salary is more than your entire profit?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    You're simply talking out of jealousy and socialist spite rather than reason.
    What am I jealous about in your view - big fat £65k salary with London's living expenses?

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    MPs represent local population - if they live in an area where council clerks are then they should learn how to live like their electorate: expenses in London are compensated.
    Average people live everywhere Alex. It's kind of the point. MPs are supposed to serve and represent their constituents, not emulate them. What use are MPs who only know what it's like to be poor or average to everyone who is not either?

    You're simply talking out of jealousy and socialist spite rather than reason.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by KentPhilip View Post
    A good solution is to house them in HMP Pentonville. Bus them into work (the houses of parliament) every day and drive them home at night in time for roll call.

    No need for a mortgage again.
    They built that huge hotel on the roundabout, that would have been a good opportunity.

    They sold off the Guards barracks, good opportunity.

    both could have housed overnight MP's and foreign dignatories.

    Leave a comment:


  • KentPhilip
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    the average salary is for a clerk in the council answering calls about council tax. An MP should not be distracted about whether they can make their mortgage payment.
    A good solution is to house them in HMP Pentonville. Bus them into work (the houses of parliament) every day and drive them home at night in time for roll call.

    No need for a mortgage again.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    the average salary is for a clerk in the council answering calls about council tax. An MP should not be distracted about whether they can make their mortgage payment.
    MPs represent local population - if they live in an area where council clerks are then they should learn how to live like their electorate: expenses in London are compensated.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    the average salary is for a clerk in the council answering calls about council tax. An MP should not be distracted about whether they can make their mortgage payment.
    For which home?

    And why do married couple MPs need at least 2 homes each?

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    £65k is 3 times the average UK salary, and most people don't get expenses paid.
    the average salary is for a clerk in the council answering calls about council tax. An MP should not be distracted about whether they can make their mortgage payment.

    Leave a comment:


  • Robinho
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    If they weren't such a bunch of useless self serving ******* they could pay themselves whatever they liked. Do something useful you twats!
    This

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    And it says a lot that an entrepreneur considers £65k an aspirational salary.
    £65k is 3 times the average UK salary, and most people don't get expenses paid. MPs tried to hide their expenses and it was only due to leak that people have learnt the kind of stuff they got paid, frankly not enough of them went to jail at the time for it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scoobos
    replied
    Lol, appeasing public opinion... Isn't following the majority public opinion the theoretical lynchpin of democracy?

    Also, MPs are public sector workers, and are therefore subject to the public sector pay freeze.

    Utter tossers.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    So, £65k, no question asked expenses, no real responsibility, gold plated pension is not enough?
    AtW maybe you missed it, but there was a bit of a story quite recently where rather a lot of questions were asked about expenses.

    And it says a lot that an entrepreneur considers £65k an aspirational salary.

    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    You really think they give a flying monkey's dick about what the public thinks?
    Of course they do, if only selfishly because it's pretty horrible being in a position where everyone hates you.
    A politician is now a job, people study to become politicians whereas before people became politicians to help the people.
    They still get into politics to change things (even if that idealism evaporates) but nowadays it's seen that studying politics is useful if you want to be in politics.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    £65k is a joke. £100k is probably a good starting salary.
    £65K part time with subsidised office & researchers to shag isn't a bad screw.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    £65k is a joke. £100k is probably a good starting salary.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X