• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Tata says ByeBye to another few hundred"

Collapse

  • The Spartan
    replied
    The whole point in them opening in China was due to the massive costs associated with importing those specific models into the country. I can't imagine for one minute it would be cheap to import a car from China to the UK, as they'd slap a load of duty and VAT on it they're not stupid enough to miss a golden opportunity like that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by fullyautomatix View Post
    It really is scandalous what Tata are doing to UK industry. Steel mills being closed and Jaguar production being shifted to China.
    Hmmm, we'll see how that works. Maybe the lower range models will be shifted, but shifting production of the high end stuff might not work. Apparently in China Zegna shirts are in demand among the wealthier people because they're still made in Italy; it seems high end consumers get emotionally attached to the idea of something being 'genuine' and connected to what they see as its origins. Logically, lots of Chinese Jaguar customers might then decide they only want Jaguars built in Britain. Or worse, they might just stop buying them altogether and buy something German or Italian.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by scope View Post
    I hope that is still the case in 10 years.. And not that they set up production there, run parallel for a few years, then stop production in UK and ship in cheaper produced cars from China.....
    that is my expectation.

    Leave a comment:


  • scope
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    They are not shifting car jobs to China there are more jobs here and more jobs there.
    I hope that is still the case in 10 years.. And not that they set up production there, run parallel for a few years, then stop production in UK and ship in cheaper produced cars from China.....

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Originally posted by fullyautomatix View Post
    Not really. I dont think Tatas are that clever. Error in judgement is more likely to be the case. From what I recall, the annual income of Corus Steel was much higher than Tata Steel but they still went ahead with the purchase so they could compete with Arcelor Mittal.
    So, you knew the answer all along.

    Even if it is incorrect. So you think Tata aren't that clever? You just underestimated the opposition.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by fullyautomatix View Post
    Not really. I dont think Tatas are that clever..
    No they must be really stupid compared with a global magnate millionaire like yourself.

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Originally posted by mos View Post
    So why have they bought these in the first place? I suspect that the regeneration and investments were the part of the deal.
    I'm sure Carbon Credits has something to do with it.

    Leave a comment:


  • fullyautomatix
    replied
    Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
    Remove the competition and snaffle their IP.

    Simples.

    Not really. I dont think Tatas are that clever. Error in judgement is more likely to be the case. From what I recall, the annual income of Corus Steel was much higher than Tata Steel but they still went ahead with the purchase so they could compete with Arcelor Mittal.

    Leave a comment:


  • mos
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    30 years of underinvest comes home to roost.
    So why have they bought these in the first place? I suspect that the regeneration and investments were the part of the deal.

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Originally posted by fullyautomatix View Post
    Jaguar is profitable. Not sure about the Steel mills being profitable but if they were not profitable then why buy them ?
    Remove the competition and snaffle their IP.

    Simples.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by mos View Post
    Improvement and automation of the production process is all good, why on earth do you have to shift jobs to China to achieve it?
    They are not shifting car jobs to China there are more jobs here and more jobs there.

    The article is about Tata closing down another unprofitable part of Corus / British steel or 30 years of underinvest comes home to roost.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    I will not buy anything owned by Tata in principle .
    So tell us who you would buy a car from then?

    Leave a comment:


  • cailin maith
    replied
    Janey Mac, Tata own every fecking thing. Did you know, they own Tetley tea bags? Seriously, isn't that just bonkers?

    Leave a comment:


  • fullyautomatix
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Hardly scandalous, is it? Do you suggest they keep unprofitable plants open?

    Jaguar is profitable. Not sure about the Steel mills being profitable but if they were not profitable then why buy them ?

    Leave a comment:


  • mos
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    Given that we write or test or project manager computer software to automate tasks and remove the need for manual intervention in processes we are hardly in a position to complain when other people do the same.

    The simple fact is that would is becoming more and more automated and less and less manual labour is required.
    Improvement and automation of the production process is all good, why on earth do you have to shift jobs to China to achieve it?
    Last edited by mos; 23 November 2012, 11:22.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X