- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Tata says ByeBye to another few hundred
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Tata says ByeBye to another few hundred"
Collapse
-
The whole point in them opening in China was due to the massive costs associated with importing those specific models into the country. I can't imagine for one minute it would be cheap to import a car from China to the UK, as they'd slap a load of duty and VAT on it they're not stupid enough to miss a golden opportunity like that.
-
Originally posted by fullyautomatix View PostIt really is scandalous what Tata are doing to UK industry. Steel mills being closed and Jaguar production being shifted to China.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by eek View PostThey are not shifting car jobs to China there are more jobs here and more jobs there.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by fullyautomatix View PostNot really. I dont think Tatas are that clever. Error in judgement is more likely to be the case. From what I recall, the annual income of Corus Steel was much higher than Tata Steel but they still went ahead with the purchase so they could compete with Arcelor Mittal.
Even if it is incorrect. So you think Tata aren't that clever? You just underestimated the opposition.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SupremeSpod View PostRemove the competition and snaffle their IP.
Simples.
Not really. I dont think Tatas are that clever. Error in judgement is more likely to be the case. From what I recall, the annual income of Corus Steel was much higher than Tata Steel but they still went ahead with the purchase so they could compete with Arcelor Mittal.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by fullyautomatix View PostJaguar is profitable. Not sure about the Steel mills being profitable but if they were not profitable then why buy them ?
Simples.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mos View PostImprovement and automation of the production process is all good, why on earth do you have to shift jobs to China to achieve it?
The article is about Tata closing down another unprofitable part of Corus / British steel or 30 years of underinvest comes home to roost.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Paddy View PostI will not buy anything owned by Tata in principle .
Leave a comment:
-
Janey Mac, Tata own every fecking thing. Did you know, they own Tetley tea bags? Seriously, isn't that just bonkers?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sasguru View PostHardly scandalous, is it? Do you suggest they keep unprofitable plants open?
Jaguar is profitable. Not sure about the Steel mills being profitable but if they were not profitable then why buy them ?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by eek View PostGiven that we write or test or project manager computer software to automate tasks and remove the need for manual intervention in processes we are hardly in a position to complain when other people do the same.
The simple fact is that would is becoming more and more automated and less and less manual labour is required.Last edited by mos; 23 November 2012, 11:22.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
Leave a comment: