• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Is internet access a right?"

Collapse

  • vetran
    replied
    His lawyers argued that the SOPO imposed by the Crown Court judge - which he said should last until the day Jackson died - was unnecessary and disproportionate.
    If they had asked for it for a fixed period then I suspect they would have been granted it.

    replacing it with an order that he simply make his internet history available for viewing by the police.

    I would suggest the order should have been for period of the sentence and the monitoring until death.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    How can something be a right that you need equipment to access? Will access to free computers/smart phones become a right first?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Once again NF ruins a perfectly good thread by bring data and logic up.....
    ...just as England's middle classes were spluttering their latte over their screens and steaming out of their ears. Nick, England's middle classes enjoy being stressed out by their newspapers, don't deny them that simple pleasure!

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    The facts of the case
    Once again NF ruins a perfectly good thread by bring data and logic up.....

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    There doesn't appear to be anything about the ruling that says it's a "right": that's a spin the journalist has put on it. Note the careful choice of words: "…a ruling that effectively renders access to the internet as a human right" - not "the court said that it is a human right".

    In fact, the court said "Nowadays it is entirely unreasonable to ban anybody from accessing the internet in their home". No mention of "a human right", but the Torygraph know that dragging the words "human right" in will push a few buttons with their readership. They might as well say that having a toilet in one's home is "a human right"; it's certainly entirely unreasonable to ban anybody from having a bog, but we all know that doesn't make having one the kind of "human right" whose granting so inflames the mob.
    ...
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to NickFitz again.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Michael Jackson was convicted of using a secret camera to film a 14-year-old girl in the shower and banned from accessing the internet.
    Cha'mon!

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    There doesn't appear to be anything about the ruling that says it's a "right": that's a spin the journalist has put on it. Note the careful choice of words: "…a ruling that effectively renders access to the internet as a human right" - not "the court said that it is a human right".

    In fact, the court said "Nowadays it is entirely unreasonable to ban anybody from accessing the internet in their home". No mention of "a human right", but the Torygraph know that dragging the words "human right" in will push a few buttons with their readership. They might as well say that having a toilet in one's home is "a human right"; it's certainly entirely unreasonable to ban anybody from having a bog, but we all know that doesn't make having one the kind of "human right" whose granting so inflames the mob.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    actually just read the story...

    wtf how did he have access to a 14 year old girls shower in the first place....

    frikin weird

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    if you can afford to pay for it you can have it..

    if not you cannot.....

    or are we now going to start letting the chavs have free internet access?

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    started a poll Is internet access a right?

    Is internet access a right?

    15
    Yes
    13.33%
    2
    No
    60.00%
    9
    Its only right for viewing piccies of AndyW's grandma.
    26.67%
    4
    Internet access is a right, judges rule - Telegraph

    Though I am amazed this bloke got a community order.

Working...
X